IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptability of self-sampling human papillomavirus test for cervical cancer screening in Japan: A questionnaire survey in the ACCESS trial

Author

Listed:
  • Misuzu Fujita
  • Kengo Nagashima
  • Minobu Shimazu
  • Misae Suzuki
  • Ichiro Tauchi
  • Miwa Sakuma
  • Setsuko Yamamoto
  • Hideki Hanaoka
  • Makio Shozu
  • Nobuhide Tsuruoka
  • Tokuzo Kasai
  • Akira Hata

Abstract

Purpose: In terms of medical policy for cervical cancer prevention, Japan lags far behind other industrialized countries. We initiated a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) test as a tool to raise screening uptake and detection of pre-cancer. This study was conducted to explore the acceptability and preference of self-sampling using a subset of the data from this trial. Methods: A pre-invitation letter was sent to eligible women, aged 30−59 years who had not undergone cervical cancer screening for three or more years. After excluding those who declined to participate in this trial, the remaining women were assigned to the self-sampling and control groups. A second invitation letter was sent to the former group, and those wanting to undergo the self-sampling test ordered the kit. A self-sampling HPV kit, consent form, and a self-administered questionnaire were sent to participants who ordered the test. Results: Of the 7,340 participants in the self-sampling group, 1,196 (16.3%) administered the test, and 1,192 (99.7%) answered the questionnaire. Acceptability of the test was favorable; 75.3−81.3% of participants agreed with positive impressions (easy, convenient, and clarity of instruction), and 65.1−77.8% disagreed with negative impressions (painful, uncomfortable, and embarrassing). However, only 21.2% were confident in their sampling procedure. Willingness to undergo screening with a self-collected sample was significantly higher than that with a doctor-collected sample (89.3% vs. 49.1%; p

Suggested Citation

  • Misuzu Fujita & Kengo Nagashima & Minobu Shimazu & Misae Suzuki & Ichiro Tauchi & Miwa Sakuma & Setsuko Yamamoto & Hideki Hanaoka & Makio Shozu & Nobuhide Tsuruoka & Tokuzo Kasai & Akira Hata, 2023. "Acceptability of self-sampling human papillomavirus test for cervical cancer screening in Japan: A questionnaire survey in the ACCESS trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286909
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286909
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286909&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eliza Lai-Yi Wong & Annie Wai-Ling Cheung & Amy Yuen-Kwan Wong & Paul Kay-Sheung Chan, 2020. "Acceptability and Feasibility of HPV Self-Sampling as an Alternative Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Population Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siew-Fei Ngu & Lesley S. K. Lau & Justin Li & Grace C. Y. Wong & Annie N. Y. Cheung & Hextan Y. S. Ngan & Karen K. L. Chan, 2022. "Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Women in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.