IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vision screening and vocational aptitude: A factor analysis approach

Author

Listed:
  • Eric S Seemiller
  • James Gaska
  • Eleanor O’Keefe
  • Elizabeth Shoda
  • Jonelle Knapp
  • Marc Winterbottom

Abstract

For a good vision screening battery to quickly and accurately reflect the status of the human visual system it should be relevant, reliable, and streamlined. Because the early visual system has limited functional architecture, many simple measurements of the visual system may in fact be measuring the shared computations and parallel processes of other visual functions, making much of the measurement process redundant. This can make a screening battery repetitious and therefore inefficient. The purpose of this research is to investigate these redundancies in a large occupational screening dataset using factor analysis. 192 subjects participated in the Operational Based Vision Assessment (OBVA) Laboratory Automated Vision Testing (AVT) procedure. The AVT includes digital tests for visual acuity, luminance and cone contrast sensitivity, motion coherence, stereopsis, and binocular motor function. Psychometric thresholds and fusional ranges were collected from each subject and a factor analysis was utilized to investigate independent latent variables in the dataset. A promax rotation revealed 5 factors that explained 74% of the total variance: (1) medium and high spatial frequency vision, (2) stereoacuity and horizontal fusional range, (3) cone contrast sensitivity, (4) motion perception, and (5) low spatial frequency vision. Practically, these results suggest that the screening battery can be reduced to 5 independent measurements that capture much of the variance in the dataset. Furthermore, the factors predicted operational and vocational aptitude better than any single variable. More interestingly, these relationships also reiterate known computational processes within the human visual system, such as the parallel processing of low and high spatial frequency content.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric S Seemiller & James Gaska & Eleanor O’Keefe & Elizabeth Shoda & Jonelle Knapp & Marc Winterbottom, 2023. "Vision screening and vocational aptitude: A factor analysis approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286513
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286513
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286513&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.