Author
Listed:
- Kelly Hendricks
- Celenkosini Thembelenkosini Nxumalo
- Mokgadi U Makgobole
- Shanaz Ghuman
- Diana Jacobs
- Nomakhosi Mpofana
Abstract
Background: Lasers of different wavelengths have been developed for use in permanent hair reduction. An increase in the manufacturing of home-use laser hair removal devices allows for these treatments to be performed in the comfort of your own home at an affordable cost. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of permanent hair reduction using a Diode laser in comparison to the Silk’n™ Flash and Go Lux (475–1200 nm) home-use laser. Methods: Fifteen females received six axillae laser hair removal treatments at two to four-week intervals using either a professional laser or home-use laser device. Photographs and hair counts were taken before each treatment and at a three week follow up. A T–test was used to evaluate statistical significance, and regression analysis to determine a difference in the effects. Pain scores and side effects were recorded by a visual analogue scale in a satisfaction questionnaire. Results: The professional laser showed an overall hair reduction of 85% on the right axilla and 88% on the left axilla. The home-use laser showed an overall reduction of 52% on the right axilla and 46,3% on the left axilla. Mild side effects were experienced for both laser devices. There were no serious adverse effects reported, safety features are effective to a certain extent. Conclusion: The Flash & Go Lux home-use laser can effectively reduce hair at a slower rate than the Diode laser. The home-use laser device offers protection against accidental exposure to light and use on darker skin types. Risks of retinal damage due to long-term exposure to home-use laser light are still cause for concern.
Suggested Citation
Kelly Hendricks & Celenkosini Thembelenkosini Nxumalo & Mokgadi U Makgobole & Shanaz Ghuman & Diana Jacobs & Nomakhosi Mpofana, 2023.
"Evaluating the effectiveness of laser hair reduction using a home use laser in comparison to a Diode laser,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0286162
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286162
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.