IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0285771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between cancer stigma and cervical cancer screening uptake among women of Dhulikhel and Banepa, Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Bandana Paneru
  • Aerona Karmacharya
  • Alina Bharati
  • Soniya Makaju
  • Bikram Adhikari
  • Dikshya Kafle
  • Sunila Shakya
  • Donna Spiegelman
  • Sangini Seth
  • Anne Stangl
  • Aamod Dhoj Shrestha
  • Archana Shrestha

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer ranks as the most common cancer among Nepalese women with a high incidence and mortality. Despite evidence that effective screening programs reduce disease burden, screening services are under-utilized. Cancer stigma can be a major barrier to cervical cancer screening uptake among Nepalese women. Objectives: This study assessed the association between cancer stigma and cervical cancer screening uptake among women residing in semi-urban areas of Kavrepalanchok district (Dhulikhel and Banepa), Nepal. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 426 women aged 30–60 years using telephone interview method from 15th June to 15th October 2021. A validated Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS) was used to measure cancer stigma and categorized women as presence of cancer stigma if the mean total score was greater than three. We obtained information on cervical cancer screening uptake through self-reported responses. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to assess the association between cancer stigma and cervical cancer screening uptake. We adjusted socio-demographic: age, ethnicity, occupation, religion and education, and reproductive health variables: parity, family planning user, age of menarche and age at first sexual intercourse during multivariable logistic regression. Results: Twenty-three percent of women had cancer stigma and 27 percent reported that they had ever been screened for cervical cancer. The odds of being screened was 0.23 times lower among women who had stigma compared to those who had no stigma (95% CI: 0.11–0.49) after adjusting for confounders: age, ethnicity, occupation, religion, education, parity, contraceptive use, age of menarche and age at first sexual intercourse. Conclusion: Women residing in semi-urban areas of Nepal and had cancer stigma were less likely to have been screened for cervical cancer. De-stigmatizing interventions may alleviate cancer stigma and contribute to higher uptake of cervical cancer screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Bandana Paneru & Aerona Karmacharya & Alina Bharati & Soniya Makaju & Bikram Adhikari & Dikshya Kafle & Sunila Shakya & Donna Spiegelman & Sangini Seth & Anne Stangl & Aamod Dhoj Shrestha & Archana Sh, 2023. "Association between cancer stigma and cervical cancer screening uptake among women of Dhulikhel and Banepa, Nepal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285771
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285771&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0285771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bandana Paneru & Aerona Karmacharya & Soniya Makaju & Diksha Kafle & Lisasha Poudel & Sushmita Mali & Priyanka Timsina & Namuna Shrestha & Dinesh Timalsena & Kalpana Chaudhary & Niroj Bhandari & Prasa, 2024. "Socio-economic factors associated with cancer stigma among apparently healthy women in two selected municipalities Nepal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.