IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0285048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognostic factors for intraoperative detection of necrotizing fasciitis in severe soft tissue infections

Author

Listed:
  • Thaer S A Abdalla
  • Rainer Grotelüschen
  • Ahmed S A Abdalla
  • Nathaniel Melling
  • Jakob R Izbicki
  • Kai Bachmann

Abstract

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but lethal soft-tissue infection. There is still a paucity of information regarding the diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies for the treatment of this devastating disease. This study aims to identify important perioperative parameters related to necrotizing fasciitis and to assess their relevance in terms of identifying NF. Methods and material: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent surgical exploration for suspected necrotizing fasciitis at a tertiary referral center, to explore the clinical features and factors related to the presence of necrotizing fasciitis and mortality. Results: Between 2010 and 2017, 88 patients underwent surgical exploration for suspected NF. The infection occurred in the lower extremities in 48 patients, in the thoracocervical region in 18 patients, and the perineum and abdomen in 22 patients. Histological evidence of NF was present in 59 of 88 patients. NF was associated with a longer hospital stay and ICU stay (p = 0.05 and 0.019 respectively) compared to patients without NF. ROC analysis showed that only macroscopic fascial appearance could discriminate patients with histological evidence of NF. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression revealed, that liver failure (p = 0.019), sepsis (p = 0.011), positive Gram stain (p = 0.032), and macroscopic fascial appearance (p

Suggested Citation

  • Thaer S A Abdalla & Rainer Grotelüschen & Ahmed S A Abdalla & Nathaniel Melling & Jakob R Izbicki & Kai Bachmann, 2023. "Prognostic factors for intraoperative detection of necrotizing fasciitis in severe soft tissue infections," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285048
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285048&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0285048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.