IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0284889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response to novel feed in dairy calves is affected by prior hay provision and presentation method

Author

Listed:
  • Chelsea R Morrow
  • Blair C Downey
  • Cassandra B Tucker

Abstract

Animals raised in environments that prevent natural foraging opportunities may have difficulty adapting to novelty, such as feeding and management changes. Our objective was to evaluate how early provision and presentation of forage in dairy calves affected response to novel TMR (total mixed ration; grain and alfalfa) at weaning. Holstein heifer calves were housed individually in a covered outdoor hutch with an attached uncovered wire-fenced pen on sand bedding. Calves were fed a diet of starter grain and milk replacer (5.7–8.4L/d step-up) via a bottle (Control, n = 9) or given additional access to mountaingrass hay presented either in a bucket (Bucket, n = 9), or PVC pipe feeder (Pipe, n = 9). Treatments were applied from birth through 50 d of age, when step-down weaning began. All calves had 3 buckets and a pipe feeder provided in their uncovered pen area. On d 50, each calf was briefly blocked inside their hutch. TMR was put in the 3rd bucket that previously contained hay (Bucket) or was empty (Control, Pipe). The calf was released from the hutch and video-recorded for 30 min. Neophobia towards TMR was affected by prior experience with presentation: Bucket calves began eating TMR faster than Pipe and Control (P≤0.012) and showed the fewest number of startle responses (P = 0.004). Intake was similar across groups (P = 0.978), suggesting this apparent neophobia was transient, but Control calves took longer to eat than Bucket (P

Suggested Citation

  • Chelsea R Morrow & Blair C Downey & Cassandra B Tucker, 2023. "Response to novel feed in dairy calves is affected by prior hay provision and presentation method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284889
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284889
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284889&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0284889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer M C Van Os & Erin M Mintline & Trevor J DeVries & Cassandra B Tucker, 2018. "Domestic cattle (Bos taurus taurus) are motivated to obtain forage and demonstrate contrafreeloading," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Rebecca K Meagher & Georgia J Mason, 2012. "Environmental Enrichment Reduces Signs of Boredom in Caged Mink," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-10, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yosuke Yawata & Yu Shikano & Jun Ogasawara & Kenichi Makino & Tetsuhiko Kashima & Keiko Ihara & Airi Yoshimoto & Shota Morikawa & Sho Yagishita & Kenji F. Tanaka & Yuji Ikegaya, 2023. "Mesolimbic dopamine release precedes actively sought aversive stimuli in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.