IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0284841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When scientific experts come to be media stars: An evolutionary model tested by analysing coronavirus media coverage across Italian newspapers

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Neresini
  • Paolo Giardullo
  • Emanuele Di Buccio
  • Barbara Morsello
  • Alberto Cammozzo
  • Andrea Sciandra
  • Marco Boscolo

Abstract

The article aims to understand the process through which scientific experts gain and maintain remarkable media visibility. It has been analysed a corpus of 213,875 articles published by the eight most important Italian newspapers across the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. By exploring this process along the different phases of the management of the emergency in Italy, it was observed that some scientific experts achieve high media visibility—and sometimes notwithstanding their low academic reputation–thus becoming a sort of “media star”. Scientific literature about the relationship between experts and media is considerable, nonetheless we found a lack of theoretical models able to analyse under which conditions experts are able to enter and to remain prominent in the media sphere. A Media Experts Evolutionary Model (MEEM) is proposed in order to analyze the main conditions under which experts can acquire visibility and how they can “survive” in media arena. We proceeded by analysing visibility of experts during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and considering both their individual credentials previously acquired and the media environment processes of selection; MEEM acts hence as a combination of these two levels. Regarding the credentials, we accounted for i) institutional role/position, ii) previous media visibility, and iii) matches between scientific credentials and media competence. In our analysis, we collected evidence that high visibility in newspapers can be seen as evolutionary in the sense that some profiles—i.e. a particular configuration of credentials—are more adapt to specific media environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Neresini & Paolo Giardullo & Emanuele Di Buccio & Barbara Morsello & Alberto Cammozzo & Andrea Sciandra & Marco Boscolo, 2023. "When scientific experts come to be media stars: An evolutionary model tested by analysing coronavirus media coverage across Italian newspapers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284841
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284841
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284841&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0284841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonia Brondi & Federico Neresini & Andrea Sciandra, 2025. "What does the word “science” evoke? Social representation of science, evaluative elements, and attitude," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 783-811, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.