IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0284728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between postoperative biomarkers of neuronal injury and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohua Wang
  • Xinli Chen
  • Fan Wu
  • Yingchao Liu
  • Yushen Yang
  • Weican Chen
  • Zhigang Pan
  • Weipeng Hu
  • Feng Zheng
  • Hefan He

Abstract

Early biomarkers are needed to identify patients at risk of developing postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Our objective was to determine neuronal injury-related biomarkers with predictive values for this condition. Six biomarkers (S100β, neuron-specific enolase [NSE], amyloid beta [Aβ], tau, neurofilament light chain, and glial fibrillary acidic protein) were evaluated. According to the first postoperative sampling time, observational studies showed that S100β was significantly higher in patients with POCD than in those without POCD (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 6.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.44−9.41). The randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that S100β (SMD: 37.31, 95% CI: 30.97−43.64) and NSE (SMD: 3.50, 95% CI: 2.71−4.28) in the POCD group were significantly higher than in the non-POCD group. The pooled data of observational studies by postoperative sampling time showed significantly higher levels of the following biomarkers in the POCD groups than in the control groups: S100β levels at 1 hour (SMD: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.07−2.64), 2 days (SMD: 27.97, 95% CI: 25.01−30.94), and 9 days (SMD: 6.41, 95% CI: 5.64−7.19); NSE levels at 1 hour (SMD: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.25−1.60), 6 hours (SMD: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.12−1.45), and 24 hours (SMD: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.38−1.29); and Aβ levels at 24 hours (SMD: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.54−3.06), 2 days (SMD: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.83−2.78), and 9 days (SMD: 2.76, 95% CI: 2.25−3.26). The pooled data of the RCT showed that the following biomarkers were significantly higher in POCD patients than in non-POCD patients: S100β levels at 2 days (SMD: 37.31, 95% CI: 30.97−43.64) and 9 days (SMD: 126.37, 95% CI: 104.97−147.76) and NSE levels at 2 days (SMD: 3.50, 95% CI: 2.71−4.28) and 9 days (SMD: 8.53, 95% CI: 7.00−10.06). High postoperative levels of S100β, NSE, and Aβ may predict POCD. The relationship between these biomarkers and POCD may be affected by sampling time.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohua Wang & Xinli Chen & Fan Wu & Yingchao Liu & Yushen Yang & Weican Chen & Zhigang Pan & Weipeng Hu & Feng Zheng & Hefan He, 2023. "Relationship between postoperative biomarkers of neuronal injury and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284728
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284728&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0284728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.