IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0284480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of machine learning approaches for the quantification of microglial cells in the brain of mice, rats and non-human primates

Author

Listed:
  • Danish M Anwer
  • Francesco Gubinelli
  • Yunus A Kurt
  • Livija Sarauskyte
  • Febe Jacobs
  • Chiara Venuti
  • Ivette M Sandoval
  • Yiyi Yang
  • Jennifer Stancati
  • Martina Mazzocchi
  • Edoardo Brandi
  • Gerard O’Keeffe
  • Kathy Steece-Collier
  • Jia-Yi Li
  • Tomas Deierborg
  • Fredric P Manfredsson
  • Marcus Davidsson
  • Andreas Heuer

Abstract

Microglial cells are brain-specific macrophages that swiftly react to disruptive events in the brain. Microglial activation leads to specific modifications, including proliferation, morphological changes, migration to the site of insult, and changes in gene expression profiles. A change in inflammatory status has been linked to many neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. For this reason, the investigation and quantification of microglial cells is essential for better understanding their role in disease progression as well as for evaluating the cytocompatibility of novel therapeutic approaches for such conditions. In the following study we implemented a machine learning-based approach for the fast and automatized quantification of microglial cells; this tool was compared with manual quantification (ground truth), and with alternative free-ware such as the threshold-based ImageJ and the machine learning-based Ilastik. We first trained the algorithms on brain tissue obtained from rats and non-human primate immunohistochemically labelled for microglia. Subsequently we validated the accuracy of the trained algorithms in a preclinical rodent model of Parkinson’s disease and demonstrated the robustness of the algorithms on tissue obtained from mice, as well as from images provided by three collaborating laboratories. Our results indicate that machine learning algorithms can detect and quantify microglial cells in all the three mammalian species in a precise manner, equipotent to the one observed following manual counting. Using this tool, we were able to detect and quantify small changes between the hemispheres, suggesting the power and reliability of the algorithm. Such a tool will be very useful for investigation of microglial response in disease development, as well as in the investigation of compatible novel therapeutics targeting the brain. As all network weights and labelled training data are made available, together with our step-by-step user guide, we anticipate that many laboratories will implement machine learning-based quantification of microglial cells in their research.

Suggested Citation

  • Danish M Anwer & Francesco Gubinelli & Yunus A Kurt & Livija Sarauskyte & Febe Jacobs & Chiara Venuti & Ivette M Sandoval & Yiyi Yang & Jennifer Stancati & Martina Mazzocchi & Edoardo Brandi & Gerard , 2023. "A comparison of machine learning approaches for the quantification of microglial cells in the brain of mice, rats and non-human primates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284480
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284480
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284480&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0284480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.