IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0284281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations of reading language preference with muscle strength and physical performance: Findings from the Integrated Women’s Health Programme (IWHP)

Author

Listed:
  • Joelle Tan Hwee Inn
  • Beverly W X Wong
  • Yiong Huak Chan
  • Huang Zhongwei
  • Susan J S Logan
  • Jane A Cauley
  • Michael S Kramer
  • Eu-Leong Yong

Abstract

Background: The contribution of language preference and ethnicity to muscle strength and physical performance is unclear. We examined the associations of reading language preferences with muscle strength and performance in Chinese women and compared them to other ethnicities. Methods: The Integrated Women’s Health Programme (IWHP) cohort comprised community-dwelling, midlife Singaporean women aged 45–69. Ethnic Chinese women could choose between the English or Chinese versions of the questionnaire. Malay and Indian women were presented with the English version. Sociodemographic, reproductive, anthropometric characteristics were obtained. Hand grip strength and physical performance were objectively assessed. Visceral adiposity (VAT) was determined by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine independent associations of language preference/ethnicity with muscle strength and physical performance. Results: The cohort comprised 1164 women (mean age: 56.3±6.2 years); 84.1% Chinese, 5.6% Malay, and 10.3% Indian. 315 Chinese participants (32.2%) had a Chinese-language reading preference (CLP). CLP women tended to be parous, of a lower socioeconomic status (lower proportions received tertiary education, lower employment rates and lower household income), and engaged in less physical activity compared to Chinese women with an English-language preference (ELP). This translated to a weaker hand grip strength (aOR: 1.56; 95%CI: 1.07–2.27), slower repeated chair stand (1.55; 1.12–2.13), poorer balance on tandem stand (2.00; 1.16–3.47), and a slower gait speed (1.62; 1.06–2.47). Compared to ELP women, Malay women had higher odds of poor hand grip strength (1.81; 1.12–2.93) while Indians had a higher odd of poor balance on one-leg stand (2.12; 1.28–3.52) and slow gait speeds on usual (1.88; 1.09–3.25) and narrow walks (1.91; 1.15–3.17). Conclusions: Chinese language reading preference was associated with inferior muscle strength and physical performance. Such disparities were largest and most consistent in the CLP group, followed by Indian and Malay women compared to the ELP group. Further studies should determine if CLP-associated muscle weakness can predict adverse health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Joelle Tan Hwee Inn & Beverly W X Wong & Yiong Huak Chan & Huang Zhongwei & Susan J S Logan & Jane A Cauley & Michael S Kramer & Eu-Leong Yong, 2023. "Associations of reading language preference with muscle strength and physical performance: Findings from the Integrated Women’s Health Programme (IWHP)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284281
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284281
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284281&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0284281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0284281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.