Author
Listed:
- Vandana Ayyar Gupta
- Jacqueline M Pitchforth
- Joana Domingos
- Deborah Ridout
- Mario Iodice
- Catherine Rye
- Mary Chesshyre
- Amy Wolfe
- Victoria Selby
- Anna Mayhew
- Elena S Mazzone
- Valeria Ricotti
- Jean-Yves Hogrel
- Erik H Niks
- Imelda de Groot
- Laurent Servais
- Volker Straub
- Eugenio Mercuri
- Adnan Y Manzur
- Francesco Muntoni
- on behalf of the iMDEX Consortium and the U.K. NorthStar Clinical Network
Abstract
The North Star ambulatory assessment (NSAA) is a functional motor outcome measure in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), widely used in clinical trials and natural history studies, as well as in clinical practice. However, little has been reported on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the NSAA. The lack of established MCID estimates for NSAA presents challenges in interpreting the significance of the results of this outcome measure in clinical trials, natural history studies and clinical practice. Combining statistical approaches and patient perspectives, this study estimated MCID for NSAA using distribution-based estimates of 1/3 standard deviation (SD) and standard error of measurement (SEM), an anchor-based approach, with six-minute walk distance (6MWD) as the anchor, and evaluation of patient and parent perception using participant-tailored questionnaires. The MCID for NSAA in boys with DMD aged 7 to 10 years based on 1/3 SD ranged from 2.3–2.9 points, and that on SEM ranged from 2.9–3.5 points. Anchored on the 6MWD, the MCID for NSAA was estimated as 3.5 points. When the impact on functional abilities was considered using participant response questionnaires, patients and parent perceived a complete loss of function in a single item or deterioration of function in one to two items of the assessment as an important change. Our study examines MCID estimates for total NSAA scores using multiple approaches, including the impact of patient and parent perspective on within scale changes in items based on complete loss of function and deterioration of function, and provides new insight on evaluation of differences in these widely used outcome measure in DMD.
Suggested Citation
Vandana Ayyar Gupta & Jacqueline M Pitchforth & Joana Domingos & Deborah Ridout & Mario Iodice & Catherine Rye & Mary Chesshyre & Amy Wolfe & Victoria Selby & Anna Mayhew & Elena S Mazzone & Valeria R, 2023.
"Determining minimal clinically important differences in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0283669
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283669
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0283669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.