IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0283382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal placebo-treatment comparisons in trials with an incomplete within-subject design and heterogeneous costs and variances

Author

Listed:
  • Mirjam Moerbeek

Abstract

The aim of a clinical trial is to compare placebo to one or more treatments. The within-subject design is known to be more efficient than the between-subject design. However, in some trials that implement a within-subject design it is not possible to evaluate the placebo and all treatments within each subject. The design then becomes an incomplete within-subject design. An important question is how many subjects should be allocated to each combination of placebo and treatments. This paper studies optimal allocations of subjects in trials with a placebo and two treatments under heterogenous costs and variances. Two optimality criteria that consider the placebo-treatment contrasts simultaneously are considered, and the design is derived under a budgetary constraint. More subjects are allocated to those combinations with higher variances and lower costs. The optimal allocation is compared to the uniform allocation, which allocates equal number of subjects to each placebo and treatment combination, and to the complete within-subject design, where placebo and all treatments are available in each subject. The methodology is illustrated on the basis of an example on consultation time in primary care. A Shiny app is available to facilitate use of the methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirjam Moerbeek, 2023. "Optimal placebo-treatment comparisons in trials with an incomplete within-subject design and heterogeneous costs and variances," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0283382
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0283382
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0283382&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0283382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0283382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.