IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Romann
  • Laura Werlen
  • Nikki Rommers
  • Anja Hermann
  • Isabelle Gisler
  • Stefano Bassetti
  • Roland Bingisser
  • Martin Siegemund
  • Tim Roloff
  • Maja Weisser
  • Veronika Muigg
  • Vladimira Hinic
  • Michael Osthoff
  • Fabian C Franzeck
  • Adrian Egli

Abstract

Background: Blood cultures (BC) are critical for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, pathogen identification, and resistance testing. Guidelines recommend a blood volume of 8–10 mL per bottle as lower volumes result in decreased sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate factors for non-adherence to recommended volumes and assess the effects on diagnostic performance. Methods: From February to April 2020, we measured collected blood volumes by weighing all BC containers from inpatient samples at the University Hospital Basel. Information on BC volumes was merged with clinical and microbiological data, as well as nursing staff schedules. We analyzed factors associated with (i) BC sampling volume, (ii) reaching recommended volumes (≥8 mL), (iii) BC positivity, and (iv) time to positivity using linear and generalized linear mixed effect models. Results: We evaluated a total of 4’118 BC bottles collected from 686 patients. A total of 1’495 (36.3%) of all bottles contained the recommended filling volume of ≥8 mL. Using a central venous and arterial catheter for drawing blood resulted in an increase of filling volume by 0.26 mL (95% CI 0.10, 0.41) and 0.50 mL (95% CI 0.31, 0.69) compared to peripheral venipuncture, respectively. Each additional nursing staff working at the time of blood drawing was associated with 6% higher odds of achieving the recommended filling volume. We found no significant correlation between the filling volume and the positivity rate. Conclusion: Our results indicate critical pre-analytical quality markers linked to BC collection procedures to reach recommended collection volumes. No significant impact on the positivity rate was found.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Romann & Laura Werlen & Nikki Rommers & Anja Hermann & Isabelle Gisler & Stefano Bassetti & Roland Bingisser & Martin Siegemund & Tim Roloff & Maja Weisser & Veronika Muigg & Vladimira Hinic & M, 2023. "Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures—Analysis at a tertiary medical center," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282918
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282918
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282918&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.