IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UsCoTc: Improved Collaborative Filtering (CFL) recommendation methodology using user confidence, time context with impact factors for performance enhancement

Author

Listed:
  • Mahesh T. R.
  • V Vinoth Kumar
  • Se-Jung Lim

Abstract

In today’s society, time is considered more valuable than money, and researchers often have limited time to find relevant papers for their research. Identifying and accessing essential information can be a challenge in this situation. To address this, the personalized suggestion system has been developed, which uses a user’s behavior data to suggest relevant items. The collaborative filtering strategy has been used to provide a user with the top research articles based on their queries and similarities with other users’ questions, thus saving time by avoiding time-consuming searches. However, when rating data is abundant but sparse, the usual method of determining user similarity is relatively straightforward. Furthermore, it fails to account for changes in users’ interests over time resulting in poor performance. This research proposes a new similarity measure approach that takes both user confidence and time context into account to increase user similarity computation. The experimental results show that the proposed technique works well with sparse data, and improves accuracy by 16.2% compared to existing models, especially during prediction. Furthermore, it enhances the quality of recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahesh T. R. & V Vinoth Kumar & Se-Jung Lim, 2023. "UsCoTc: Improved Collaborative Filtering (CFL) recommendation methodology using user confidence, time context with impact factors for performance enhancement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282904
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282904
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282904&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.