IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The performance evaluation of management mode of small water resources projects

Author

Listed:
  • Shengteng Qu
  • Huan Chen
  • Zhuge Shen
  • Haoxiang Ma

Abstract

Due to a series of societal factors, management of small rural water resources projects in China experience management problems. Based on the management mode of small water resources projects in three representative regions of Guangdong Province, the improved TOPSIS model is applied to evaluate the performance of management mode of small water resources projects through the combination with entropy weight method. Compared with the traditional TOPSIS model concerning the evaluation object of this paper, the evaluation value formulas of optimal and worst solutions of TOPSIS method are improved. The evaluation index system takes into account the coverage, hierarchy and systematization of indicators, and maintains a management mode with high environmental adaptability, so that the continuous operation of management mode can guaranteed. The results show that the management mode of water user association is most suitable for the development of small water resources projects in Guangdong Province.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengteng Qu & Huan Chen & Zhuge Shen & Haoxiang Ma, 2023. "The performance evaluation of management mode of small water resources projects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282357
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282357
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282357&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Yan & Zhou, Peng & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2020. "Evaluating urban land use efficiency with interacting criteria: An empirical study of cities in Jiangsu China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Roman Vavrek & Jiří Bečica, 2022. "Similarity of TOPSIS results based on criterion variability: Case study on public economic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. You, Lie & Li, Yurui & Wang, Rui & Pan, Haozhi, 2020. "A benefit evaluation model for build-up land use in megacity suburban districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Roman Vavrek, 2024. "How much is too much: A case study of local self-government units in Slovakia using absolute variability to determine the importance of financial criteria in MCDM analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Yingkai Tang & Kun Wang & Xuanming Ji & He Xu & Yangqing Xiao, 2021. "Assessment and Spatial-Temporal Evolution Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency under Green Development Orientation: Case of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Jingbo Liu & Haoyuan Feng & Kun Wang, 2022. "The Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy and Urban Land Use Efficiency: A Policy Assessment from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Yanqi Zhao & Yue Zhang & Ying Yang & Fan Li & Rongkun Dai & Jianlin Li & Mingshi Wang & Zhenhua Li, 2023. "The Impact of Land Use Structure Change on Utilization Performance in Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Xianxian Fan & Xin Jiang, 2024. "Regional differences and convergence of urban land green use efficiency in China under the constraints of carbon neutrality," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23499-23525, September.
    12. Han Chen & Chunyu Meng & Qilin Cao, 2022. "Measurement and Influencing Factors of Low Carbon Urban Land Use Efficiency—Based on Non-Radial Directional Distance Function," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Kai Guo & Yiyun Chen & Min Chen & Chaojun Wang & Zeyi Chen & Weinan Cai & Renjie Li & Weiming Feng & Ming Jiang, 2021. "Causal Analysis of Ecological Impairment in Land Ecosystem on a Regional Scale: Applied to a Mining City Daye, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Yao, Yongling & Pan, Haozhi & Cui, Xiaoyu & Wang, Zhen, 2022. "Do compact cities have higher efficiencies of agglomeration economies? A dynamic panel model with compactness indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Kun Ge & Shan Zou & Xinhai Lu & Shangan Ke & Danling Chen & Zhangsheng Liu, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution and the Mechanism behind the Coupling Coordination Relationship between Industrial Integration and Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Zone in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Yue Zhou & Yi Chen & Yi Hu, 2021. "Assessing Efficiency of Urban Land Utilisation under Environmental Constraints in Yangtze River Delta, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Xufeng Cui & Sisi Huang & Cuicui Liu & Tingting Zhou & Ling Shan & Fengyuan Zhang & Min Chen & Fei Li & Walter T. de Vries, 2021. "Applying SBM-GPA Model to Explore Urban Land Use Efficiency Considering Ecological Development in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Pinto, Ana M.F. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Spahr, Ronald W. & Sunderman, Mark A. & Govindan, Kannan & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, Ieva, 2021. "Analyzing blight impacts on urban areas: A multi-criteria approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Koroso, Nesru H., 2023. "Urban land policy and urban land use efficiency: An analysis based on remote sensing and institutional credibility thesis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. Liangen Zeng, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Green Use Efficiency in China Based on the EBM Model with Undesirable Outputs and the Spatial Dubin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.