Author
Listed:
- Elisabeth Lafuente Cabrero
- Roser Terradas Robledo
- Anna Civit Cuñado
- Diana García Sardelli
- Carlota Hidalgo López
- Dolors Giro Formatger
- Laia Lacueva Perez
- Cristina Esquinas López
- Avelina Tortosa Moreno
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) is high and is a severe health problem associated with an increase in mortality and elevated economic costs. There are discrepancies related to the risk factors of CLABSI since the results published are very heterogeneous and there is no synthesis in the description of all the predisposing factors. Objective: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize and establish the risk factors predisposing to CLABSI reported in the literature. Method: This is a systematic review of observational studies following the PRISMA recommendations. MEDLINE and CINAHL databases were searched for primary studies from 2007 to 2021. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO CRD42018083564. Results: A total of 654 studies were identified, 23 of which were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis included 17 studies and 9 risk factors were analyzed (total parenteral nutrition (TPN), chemotherapy, monolumen and bilumen catheters, days of catheterization, immunosuppression, kidney disease and diabetes mellitus) due to the homogeneity of their definitions and measurements. The risk factors found to increase the probability of developing CLABSI were TPN, multilumen devices, chemotherapy treatment, immunosuppression and the number of days of catheterization. On the other hand, monolumen devices presented a lower likelihood of triggering this infection.
Suggested Citation
Elisabeth Lafuente Cabrero & Roser Terradas Robledo & Anna Civit Cuñado & Diana García Sardelli & Carlota Hidalgo López & Dolors Giro Formatger & Laia Lacueva Perez & Cristina Esquinas López & Avelina, 2023.
"Risk factors of catheter- associated bloodstream infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0282290
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282290
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.