IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0281515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency analysis by training sequence of high-fidelity simulation-based neonatal resuscitation program (NRP)

Author

Listed:
  • Seoheui Choi
  • Hoyeon Shim
  • Jang H Lee

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to find a more effective education method in a neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) using a high-fidelity simulation that has recently shown positive results in terms of its effectiveness. Study design: A single-blind prospective cohort study was performed. The high-fidelity simulation model was used in a formal NRP training course for trainees caring for neonatal patients. The trainees were divided into a group that conducted the scenario after the lecture (Group A) and a group that attended the lecture after the scenario (Group B) and they both took the test before, during, and after the training. Results: The increase in score after theory training was statistically significant in both groups, but the final score did not differ between the two groups. However, when compared by career, in Group A, trainees under 24 months tended to be more effective, and in Group B, trainees over 24 months tended to be more effective. Conclusion: The difference in short-term memory of trainees according to the order of education identified by the test score was not prominent, but it was found that the degree of difference in test scores for the order of education tended to be different according to the career. It is thought that the effectiveness of the training might be increased by changing the education order according to the degree of experience of each trainee. More effective educational methods should be introduced by continuously developing lectures for repeated education of various trainees in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Seoheui Choi & Hoyeon Shim & Jang H Lee, 2023. "Efficiency analysis by training sequence of high-fidelity simulation-based neonatal resuscitation program (NRP)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281515
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281515
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281515&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0281515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.