IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0281235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Awareness, susceptibility, and use of oral nicotine pouches and comparative risk perceptions with smokeless tobacco among young adults in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Meghan E Morean
  • Krysten W Bold
  • Danielle R Davis
  • Grace Kong
  • Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
  • Deepa R Camenga

Abstract

Background: Oral nicotine pouches (NPs) that contain nicotine but no tobacco leaves are rapidly gaining popularity. However, there is limited research on NPs, including within priority populations. In the current study, we examined awareness of, susceptibility to, and use of NPs in young adults as well as comparative risk perceptions with smokeless tobacco. Methods: In 2021, 609 young adults (18–25 years) completed an online survey. Participants reported on NP awareness, susceptibility, and use as well as on comparative product perceptions for NPs versus smokeless tobacco. We ran unadjusted between-groups comparisons and an adjusted multinomial logistic regression to identify relationships between product perceptions and NP susceptibility and use. Results: 41.5% of participants had heard of NPs before. Participants were non-susceptible (66.2%), susceptible (23.5%), or had used NPs (10.3%). Comparative product perceptions between NPs and smokeless tobacco suggested that young adults, as a whole, expressed uncertainty about the relative risk/benefit of using NPs versus smokeless tobacco. However, as expected, unadjusted and adjusted findings indicated that favorable perceptions of NPs versus smokeless tobacco were disproportionately observed among susceptible participants and NP users compared to non-susceptible individuals. Demographic differences were also observed (e.g., NP users were more likely than non-susceptible and susceptible individuals to have used smokeless tobacco). Conclusions: Young adults reported awareness of, susceptibility to, and use of NPs, with findings indicating that favorable perceptions of NPs versus smokeless tobacco may contribute to NP susceptibility and use beyond known correlates like smokeless tobacco use. However, further research is needed to understand the full range of factors that are associated with NP susceptibility and use. It will be important to disentangle factors that are associated with potential positive public health impacts (e.g., switching from smokeless tobacco to exclusive NP use) from those associated with negative public health impacts (e.g., initiation among nicotine naïve individuals).

Suggested Citation

  • Meghan E Morean & Krysten W Bold & Danielle R Davis & Grace Kong & Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin & Deepa R Camenga, 2023. "Awareness, susceptibility, and use of oral nicotine pouches and comparative risk perceptions with smokeless tobacco among young adults in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281235
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281235
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281235&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0281235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonie S. Brose & Máirtín S. McDermott & Ann McNeill, 2021. "Heated Tobacco Products and Nicotine Pouches: A Survey of People with Experience of Smoking and/or Vaping in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Erin A. Vogel & Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis & Afton Kechter & Alayna P. Tackett & Fei Liu & Steve Sussman & Caryn Lerman & Jennifer B. Unger & Chanita Hughes Halbert & Benjamin W. Chaffee & Adam M. L, 2022. "Differences in Young Adults’ Perceptions of and Willingness to Use Nicotine Pouches by Tobacco Use Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindsey S. Sparrock & Lilianna Phan & Julia Chen-Sankey & Kiana Hacker & Aniruddh Ajith & Bambi Jewett & Kelvin Choi, 2023. "Nicotine Pouch: Awareness, Beliefs, Use, and Susceptibility among Current Tobacco Users in the United States, 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Sadiya Bi Shaikh & Chad Newton & Wai Cheung Tung & Yehao Sun & Dongmei Li & Deborah Ossip & Irfan Rahman, 2023. "Classification, Perception, and Toxicity of Emerging Flavored Oral Nicotine Pouches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Michael S. Dunbar & Joan S. Tucker, 2022. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Emerging Trends in Combustible Tobacco and Vaping Product Use”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-4, April.
    4. Darren Mays & Lauren Long & Mahmood A. Alalwan & Theodore L. Wagener & Ce Shang & Megan E. Roberts & Joanne G. Patterson & Brittney Keller-Hamilton, 2023. "The Effects of Oral Nicotine Pouch Packaging Features on Adult Tobacco Users’ and Non-Users’ Product Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Erin A. Vogel & Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis & Afton Kechter & Alayna P. Tackett & Fei Liu & Steve Sussman & Caryn Lerman & Jennifer B. Unger & Chanita Hughes Halbert & Benjamin W. Chaffee & Adam M. L, 2022. "Differences in Young Adults’ Perceptions of and Willingness to Use Nicotine Pouches by Tobacco Use Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.