IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights into non-informative results from non-invasive prenatal screening through gestational age, maternal BMI, and age analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Juraj Gazdarica
  • Natalia Forgacova
  • Tomas Sladecek
  • Marcel Kucharik
  • Jaroslav Budis
  • Michaela Hyblova
  • Martina Sekelska
  • Andrej Gnip
  • Gabriel Minarik
  • Tomas Szemes

Abstract

The discovery of cell-free fetal DNA fragments in the maternal plasma initiated a novel testing method in prenatal care, called non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). One of the limitations of NIPS is the necessity for a sufficient proportion of fetal fragments in the analyzed circulating DNA mixture (fetal fraction), otherwise, the sample is uninterpretable. We present the effect of gestational age, maternal body mass index (BMI), and maternal age on the fetal fraction (FF) of the sample. We retrospectively analyzed data from 5543 pregnant women with a single male fetus who underwent NIPS from which 189 samples received a repeat testing due to an insufficient FF. We showed the relationship between the failure rate of the samples after the repeated analysis, the FF, and the gestational age at the first sampling. Next, we found that different maternal BMI categories affect the FF and thus the chance of an informative redraw. A better understanding of the factors affecting the FF will reduce the number of non-informative calls from repeated analyzes. In this study, we provide helpful information to clinicians on how to approach non-informative analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Juraj Gazdarica & Natalia Forgacova & Tomas Sladecek & Marcel Kucharik & Jaroslav Budis & Michaela Hyblova & Martina Sekelska & Andrej Gnip & Gabriel Minarik & Tomas Szemes, 2024. "Insights into non-informative results from non-invasive prenatal screening through gestational age, maternal BMI, and age analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280858
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280858
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280858&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.