IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluate teaching quality of physical education using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenyin Chen
  • Suizhi Luo

Abstract

The teaching quality evaluation of physical education is an important measure to promote the professional development of physical teachers, improve the quality of school teaching and personnel training. It is helpful for students to achieve all-round development and better meet the needs of modern talents in the new era. This study aims to establish a novel MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making) framework for evaluating teaching quality of physical education. First, PFNs (picture fuzzy numbers) are suggested to reflect dissimilar attitudes or preferences of decision makers. Then, the typical SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) model is modified with PFNs to calculate the weights of evaluation criteria. Considering that some criteria are non-compensatory during the evaluation process, the idea of ELECTRE (elimination and choice translating reality) is introduced to obtain the ranking results of alternatives. Specially, the MAIRCA (Multi-Attribute Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) method is extended to construct the difference matrix in a picture fuzzy environment. Last, the hybrid MCDM model is utilized to assess the teaching quality of physical education. Its superiority is justified through comparison analyses. Results show that our approach is practicable and can provide instructions for the teaching quality evaluation of physical education.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenyin Chen & Suizhi Luo, 2023. "Evaluate teaching quality of physical education using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280845
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280845
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280845&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.