IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting mortality after start of long-term dialysis–International validation of one- and two-year prediction models

Author

Listed:
  • Mikko Haapio
  • Merel van Diepen
  • Retha Steenkamp
  • Jaakko Helve
  • Friedo W Dekker
  • Fergus Caskey
  • Patrik Finne

Abstract

Background: Mortality prediction is critical on long-term kidney replacement therapy (KRT), both for individual treatment decisions and resource planning. Many mortality prediction models already exist, but as a major shortcoming most of them have only been validated internally. This leaves reliability and usefulness of these models in other KRT populations, especially foreign, unknown. Previously two models were constructed for one- and two-year mortality prediction of Finnish patients starting long-term dialysis. These models are here internationally validated in KRT populations of the Dutch NECOSAD Study and the UK Renal Registry (UKRR). Methods: We validated the models externally on 2051 NECOSAD patients and on two UKRR patient cohorts (5328 and 45493 patients). We performed multiple imputation for missing data, used c-statistic (AUC) to assess discrimination, and evaluated calibration by plotting average estimated probability of death against observed risk of death. Results: Both prediction models performed well in the NECOSAD population (AUC 0.79 for the one-year model and 0.78 for the two-year model). In the UKRR populations, performance was slightly weaker (AUCs: 0.73 and 0.74). These are to be compared to the earlier external validation in a Finnish cohort (AUCs: 0.77 and 0.74). In all tested populations, our models performed better for PD than HD patients. Level of death risk (i.e., calibration) was well estimated by the one-year model in all cohorts but was somewhat overestimated by the two-year model. Conclusions: Our prediction models showed good performance not only in the Finnish but in foreign KRT populations as well. Compared to the other existing models, the current models have equal or better performance and fewer variables, thus increasing models’ usability. The models are easily accessible on the web. These results encourage implementing the models into clinical decision-making widely among European KRT populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikko Haapio & Merel van Diepen & Retha Steenkamp & Jaakko Helve & Friedo W Dekker & Fergus Caskey & Patrik Finne, 2023. "Predicting mortality after start of long-term dialysis–International validation of one- and two-year prediction models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280831
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280831
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280831&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merel van Diepen & Marielle A Schroijen & Olaf M Dekkers & Joris I Rotmans & Raymond T Krediet & Elisabeth W Boeschoten & Friedo W Dekker, 2014. "Predicting Mortality in Patients with Diabetes Starting Dialysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-7, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toshiki Doi & Suguru Yamamoto & Takatoshi Morinaga & Ken-ei Sada & Noriaki Kurita & Yoshihiro Onishi, 2015. "Risk Score to Predict 1-Year Mortality after Haemodialysis Initiation in Patients with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease under Predialysis Nephrology Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.