IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New AI-algorithms on smartphones to detect skin cancer in a clinical setting—A validation study

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Kränke
  • Katharina Tripolt-Droschl
  • Lukas Röd
  • Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof
  • Michael Koppitz
  • Michael Tripolt

Abstract

Background and objectives: The incidence of skin cancer is rising worldwide and there is medical need to optimize its early detection. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic and risk-assessment accuracy of two new diagnosis-based neural networks (analyze and detect), which comply with the CE-criteria, in evaluating the malignant potential of various skin lesions on a smartphone. Of note, the intention of our study was to evaluate the performance of these medical products in a clinical setting for the first time. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center clinical study at one tertiary referral center in Graz, Austria. Patients, who were either scheduled for preventive skin examination or removal of at least one skin lesion were eligible for participation. Patients were assessed by at least two dermatologists and by the integrated algorithms on different mobile phones. The lesions to be recorded were randomly selected by the dermatologists. The diagnosis of the algorithm was stated as correct if it matched the diagnosis of the two dermatologists or the histology (if available). The histology was the reference standard, however, if both clinicians considered a lesion as being benign no histology was performed and the dermatologists were stated as reference standard. Results: A total of 238 patients with 1171 lesions (86 female; 36.13%) with an average age of 66.19 (SD = 17.05) was included. Sensitivity and specificity of the detect algorithm were 96.4% (CI 93.94–98.85) and 94.85% (CI 92.46–97.23); for the analyze algorithm a sensitivity of 95.35% (CI 93.45–97.25) and a specificity of 90.32% (CI 88.1–92.54) were achieved. Discussion: The studied neural networks succeeded analyzing the risk of skin lesions with a high diagnostic accuracy showing that they are sufficient tools in calculating the probability of a skin lesion being malignant. In conjunction with the wide spread use of smartphones this new AI approach opens the opportunity for a higher early detection rate of skin cancer with consecutive lower epidemiological burden of metastatic cancer and reducing health care costs. This neural network moreover facilitates the empowerment of patients, especially in regions with a low density of medical doctors. Registration: Approved and registered at the ethics committee of the Medical University of Graz, Austria (Approval number: 30–199 ex 17/18).

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Kränke & Katharina Tripolt-Droschl & Lukas Röd & Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof & Michael Koppitz & Michael Tripolt, 2023. "New AI-algorithms on smartphones to detect skin cancer in a clinical setting—A validation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280670
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280670
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280670&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.