IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recruitment strategies and HPV self-collection return rates for under-screened women for cervical cancer prevention

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer S Smith
  • Olivia M Vaz
  • Charley E Gaber
  • Andrea C Des Marais
  • Bhavika Chirumamilla
  • Lori Hendrickson
  • Lynn Barclay
  • Alice R Richman
  • Xian Brooks
  • Anna Pfaff
  • Noel T Brewer

Abstract

In the United States, medically underserved women carry a heavier burden of cancer incidence and mortality, yet are largely underrepresented in cancer prevention studies. My Body, My Test is a n observational cohort, multi-phase cervical cancer prevention study in North Carolina that recruited low-income women, aged 30–65 years and who had not undergone Pap testing in ≥ 4 years. Participants were offered home-based self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples for primary HPV testing. Here, we aimed to describe the recruitment strategies utilized by study staff, and the resulting recruitment and self-collection kit return rates for each specific recruitment strategy. Participants were recruited through different approaches: either direct (active, staff-effort intensive) or indirect (passive on the part of study staff). Of a total of 1,475 individuals screened for eligibility, 695 were eligible (47.1%) and 487 (70% of eligible) participants returned their self-collection kit. Small media recruitment resulted in the highest number of individuals found to be study eligible, with a relatively high self-collection kit return of 70%. In-clinic in-reach resulted in a lower number of study-eligible women, yet had the highest kit return rate (90%) among those sent kits. In contrast, 211 recruitment which resulted in the lowest kit return of 54%. Small media, word of mouth, and face-to-face outreach resulted in self-collection kit return rates ranging from 72 to 79%. The recruitment strategies undertaken by study staff support the continued study of reaching under-screened populations into cervical cancer prevention studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer S Smith & Olivia M Vaz & Charley E Gaber & Andrea C Des Marais & Bhavika Chirumamilla & Lori Hendrickson & Lynn Barclay & Alice R Richman & Xian Brooks & Anna Pfaff & Noel T Brewer, 2023. "Recruitment strategies and HPV self-collection return rates for under-screened women for cervical cancer prevention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280638
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280638
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280638&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.