IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Difficulties in summing log-normal distributions for abundance and potential solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Emma J Talis
  • Christian Che-Castaldo
  • Heather J Lynch

Abstract

The log-normal distribution, often used to model animal abundance and its uncertainty, is central to ecological modeling and conservation but its statistical properties are less intuitive than those of the normal distribution. The right skew of the log-normal distribution can be considerable for highly uncertain estimates and the median is often chosen as a point estimate. However, the use of the median can become complicated when summing across populations since the median of the sum of log-normal distributions is not the sum of the constituent medians. Such estimates become sensitive to the spatial or taxonomic scale over which abundance is being summarized and the naive estimate (the median of the distribution representing the sum across populations) can become grossly inflated. Here we review the statistical issues involved and some alternative formulations that might be considered by ecologists interested in modeling abundance. Using a recent estimate of global avian abundance as a case study (Callaghan et al. 2021), we investigate the properties of several alternative methods of summing across species’ abundance, including the sorted summing used in the original study (Callaghan et al. 2021) and the use of shifted log-normal distributions, truncated normal distributions, and rectified normal distributions. The appropriate method of summing across distributions was intimately tied to the use of the mean or median as the measure of central tendency used as the point estimate. Use of the shifted log-normal distribution, however, generated scale-consistent estimates for global abundance across a spectrum of contexts. Our paper highlights how seemingly inconsequential decisions regarding the estimation of abundance yield radically different estimates of global abundance and its uncertainty, with conservation consequences that are underappreciated and require careful consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma J Talis & Christian Che-Castaldo & Heather J Lynch, 2023. "Difficulties in summing log-normal distributions for abundance and potential solutions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280351
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280351
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280351&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Che-Castaldo & Stephanie Jenouvrier & Casey Youngflesh & Kevin T. Shoemaker & Grant Humphries & Philip McDowall & Laura Landrum & Marika M. Holland & Yun Li & Rubao Ji & Heather J. Lynch, 2017. "Pan-Antarctic analysis aggregating spatial estimates of Adélie penguin abundance reveals robust dynamics despite stochastic noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.