IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0279643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient hesitancy in perioperative clinical trial enrollment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Josue D Chirinos
  • Isabella S Turco
  • Raffaele Di Fenza
  • Stefano Gianni
  • Grant M Larson
  • Joseph F Swingle
  • Oluwaseun Akeju
  • Lorenzo Berra

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused tremendous disruptions to non-COVID-19 clinical research. However, there has been little investigation on how patients themselves have responded to clinical trial recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic. To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of patient consent to enrollment into non-COVID-19 clinical trials, we carried out a cross-sectional study using data from the Nitric Oxide/Acute Kidney Injury (NO/AKI) and Minimizing ICU Neurological Dysfunction with Dexmedetomidine-Induced Sleep (MINDDS) trials. All patients eligible for the NO/AKI or MINDDS trials who came to the hospital for cardiac surgery and were approached to gain consent to enrollment were included in the current study. We defined “Before COVID-19” as the time between the start of the relevant clinical trial and the date when efforts toward that clinical trial were deescalated by the hospital due to COVID-19. We defined “During COVID-19” as the time between trial de-escalation and trial completion. 5,015 patients were screened for eligibility. 3,851 were excluded, and 1,434 were approached to gain consent to enrollment. The rate of consent to enrollment was 64% in the “Before COVID-19” group and 45% in the “During COVID-19” group (n = 1,334, P

Suggested Citation

  • Josue D Chirinos & Isabella S Turco & Raffaele Di Fenza & Stefano Gianni & Grant M Larson & Joseph F Swingle & Oluwaseun Akeju & Lorenzo Berra, 2023. "Patient hesitancy in perioperative clinical trial enrollment during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279643
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279643
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279643&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0279643?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.