IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0279603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived sounds and their reported level of disturbance in intensive care units: A multinational survey among healthcare professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Ruettgers
  • Aileen C Naef
  • Marilyne Rossier
  • Samuel E J Knobel
  • Marie-Madlen Jeitziner
  • Martin Grosse Holtforth
  • Bjoern Zante
  • Joerg C Schefold
  • Tobias Nef
  • Stephan M Gerber

Abstract

Purpose: The noise levels in intensive care units have been repeatedly reported to exceed the recommended guidelines and yield negative health outcomes among healthcare professionals. However, it is unclear which sound sources within this environment are perceived as disturbing. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate how healthcare professionals in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria perceive the sound levels and the associated sound sources within their work environment and explore sound reduction strategies. Material and methods: An online survey was conducted among 350 healthcare professionals working in intensive care units. The survey consisted of items on demographic and hospital data and questions about the perception of the sound levels [1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)], disturbance from sound sources [1 (not disturbing at all) to 5 (very disturbing)], and implementation potential, feasibility, and motivation to reduce sound reduction measures [1 (not high at all) to 5 (very high)]. Results: Approximately 69.3% of the healthcare professionals perceived the sound levels in the ICUs as too high. Short-lasting human sounds (e.g. moans or laughs) [mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD) = 3.30 ± 0.81], devices and alarms (M ± SD = 2.67 ± 0.59), and short-lasting object sounds (M ± SD = 2.55 ± 0.68) were perceived as the most disturbing sounds. Reducing medical equipment alarms was considered to have greater implementation potential [M ± SD = 3.62 ± 0.92, t(334) = -7.30, p

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Ruettgers & Aileen C Naef & Marilyne Rossier & Samuel E J Knobel & Marie-Madlen Jeitziner & Martin Grosse Holtforth & Bjoern Zante & Joerg C Schefold & Tobias Nef & Stephan M Gerber, 2022. "Perceived sounds and their reported level of disturbance in intensive care units: A multinational survey among healthcare professionals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279603
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279603
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279603&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0279603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.