IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0279385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The single pregnancy predicting model of 1 minute Apgar score less than 7 after preterm birth: A retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Xi-Shi Lin
  • Xin-Yun Peng
  • Meng-Meng Yang
  • Lin-li Ning
  • Yu-Wei Shao
  • Ying Jiang
  • Su-Wen Feng
  • Qiong Luo

Abstract

Preterm delivery is greatly associated with perinatal mortality and morbidity, while there is no objective way to identify high-risk newborns currently. This study aimed at discovering the risk factor for Apgar score less than 7 at 1 minute of preterm neonates born with vaginal delivery. A retrospective study was performed in single pregnancy women with a vaginal delivery before 37 weeks of gestation. All the preterm infants were categorized into three types: very preterm birth (28 to 32 weeks), moderate preterm birth (32 to 34 weeks) and late preterm birth (34 to 37 weeks). Risk factors were identified through logistic regression analysis in every category of newborns mentioned above. And the receiver operating characteristic analysis was used in continuous variables to determine the best threshold of the outcome. On the basis of the selected factors, the predicting models are created and its prognosticating ability is compared by the area under the curve. A nomogram was established for the proved best model. A total of 981 cases were investigated, of whom 55 were found with 1 min Apgar scores less than 7. The nomogram was set for the predicting model with larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of which is 0.742(95% confidence interval = 0.670–0.805) in very preterm birth, with the variables of first and second labor stage(> = 1.6 hours), birthweight and MgSO4(magnesium sulfate), and is 0.807(95% confidence interval = 0.776–0.837) in late preterm birth, with the variables of second labor stage(> = 1.23 hours), birthweight, a history of previous cesarean delivery, fetal distress and placental abruption. The combination of first and second labor stage, newborn weight and MgSO4 use can predict 74.2% of 1 minute Apgar score

Suggested Citation

  • Xi-Shi Lin & Xin-Yun Peng & Meng-Meng Yang & Lin-li Ning & Yu-Wei Shao & Ying Jiang & Su-Wen Feng & Qiong Luo, 2022. "The single pregnancy predicting model of 1 minute Apgar score less than 7 after preterm birth: A retrospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279385
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279385
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279385&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0279385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fei Li & Ting Wu & Xiaoping Lei & Hao Zhang & Meng Mao & Jun Zhang, 2013. "The Apgar Score and Infant Mortality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-8, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Cheng & Zhang, Shiying & Zhao, Qingguo & Lin, Yan, 2021. "Dragon year superstition, birth timing, and neonatal health outcomes," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Gaitree K. Baldewsingh & Ashna D. Hindori-Mohangoo & Edward D. van Eer & Hannah H. Covert & Arti Shankar & Jeffrey K. Wickliffe & Lizheng Shi & Maureen Y. Lichtveld & Wilco C. W. R. Zijlmans, 2021. "Association of Mercury Exposure and Maternal Sociodemographics on Birth Outcomes of Indigenous and Tribal Women in Suriname," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.