IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0279321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol for a randomized study assessing the feasibility of home-based albuminuria screening among the general population: The THOMAS study

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique van Mil
  • Lyanne M Kieneker
  • Birgitte Evers-Roeten
  • Marc H M Thelen
  • Hanne de Vries
  • Marc H Hemmelder
  • Annemiek Dorgelo
  • Ronald W van Etten
  • Hiddo J L Heerspink
  • Ron T Gansevoort

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a rising public health problem that may progress to kidney failure, requiring kidney replacement therapy. It is also associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Because of its asymptomatic nature, CKD is often detected in a late stage. Population screening for albuminuria could allow early detection of people with CKD who may benefit from preventive treatment. In case such screening is performed in a general practitioner (GP) setting, this will result in relatively high costs. Home-based screening might be an effective and cost-effective alternative. Aim: The THOMAS study (Towards HOMe-based Albuminuria Screening) is designed to prospectively investigate two methods for home-based population screening for increased albuminuria to detect yet undiagnosed CKD and risk factors for progression and CVD. Methods: This investigator initiated, randomized population-based study will include 15.000 individuals aged 45–80 years, who will be randomly assigned to be invited for a home-based screening test for albuminuria with a more conventional urine collection device or an innovative smartphone application. If the test result is positive upon confirmation (i.e., elevated albuminuria), participants are invited to a central screening facility for an elaborate screening for CKD and CVD risk factors. Participants are referred to their GP for appropriate treatment, if abnormalities are found. Primary endpoints are the participation rate, yield, and cost-effectiveness of the home-based screening and elaborate screening. Conclusions: The THOMAS study will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based albuminuria screening in the general population for the early detection of CKD and CVD risk factors. It will provide insight into the willingness to participate in population screening for CKD and into the compliance of the general population to a corresponding screening protocol and compliance to participate. Thus, it may help to develop an attractive novel screening strategy for the early detection of CKD. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT04295889, registered 05 March 2020. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=NCT04295889.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique van Mil & Lyanne M Kieneker & Birgitte Evers-Roeten & Marc H M Thelen & Hanne de Vries & Marc H Hemmelder & Annemiek Dorgelo & Ronald W van Etten & Hiddo J L Heerspink & Ron T Gansevoort, 2022. "Protocol for a randomized study assessing the feasibility of home-based albuminuria screening among the general population: The THOMAS study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279321
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279321
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279321&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0279321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.