IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0279177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term benefits for lower socioeconomic groups by improving bowel screening participation in South Australia: A modelling study

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Lal
  • Lan Gao
  • Elise Tan
  • Nikki McCaffrey
  • David Roder
  • Elizabeth Buckley

Abstract

Introduction: The gap in bowel cancer screening participation rates between the lowest socioeconomic position (SEP) groups and the highest in Australia is widening. This study estimates the long-term health impacts and healthcare costs at current colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation rates by SEP in South Australia (SA). Methods: A Markov microsimulation model for each socioeconomic quintile in SA estimated health outcomes over the lifetime of a population aged 50–74 years (total n = 513,000). The model simulated the development of CRC, considering participation rates in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program and estimated numbers of cases of CRC, CRC deaths, adenomas detected, mean costs of screening and treatment, and quality adjusted life years. Screened status, stage of diagnosis and survival were obtained for patients diagnosed with CRC in 2006–2013 using data linked to the SA Cancer Registry. Results: We predict 10915 cases of CRC (95%CI: 8017─13812) in the lowest quintile (Q1), 17% more than the highest quintile (Q5) and 3265 CRC deaths (95%CI: 2120─4410) in Q1, 24% more than Q5. Average costs per person, were 29% higher in Q1 at $11997 ($8754─$15240) compared to Q5 $9281 ($6555─$12007). When substituting Q1 screening and diagnostic testing rates with Q5’s, 17% more colonoscopies occur and adenomas and cancers detected increase by 102% in Q1. Conclusion: Inequalities were evident in CRC cases and deaths, as well as adenomas and cancers that could be detected earlier. Implementing programs to increase screening uptake and follow-up tests for lower socioeconomic groups is critical to improve the health of these priority population groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Lal & Lan Gao & Elise Tan & Nikki McCaffrey & David Roder & Elizabeth Buckley, 2022. "Long-term benefits for lower socioeconomic groups by improving bowel screening participation in South Australia: A modelling study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279177
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0279177&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0279177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anita Lal & Mohammadreza Mohebi & Kerryann Wyatt & Ayesha Ghosh & Kate Broun & Lan Gao & Nikki McCaffrey, 2024. "Tailored recruitment interventions to improve bowel cancer screening in Arabic and Mandarin speaking groups: Modelled cost-effectiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0279177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.