IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0278449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Black Queen Hypothesis, partial privatization, and quorum sensing evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Santana Souza
  • Yasuhiko Irie
  • Shigetoshi Eda

Abstract

Microorganisms produce costly cooperative goods whose benefit is partially shared with nonproducers, called ‘mixed’ goods. The Black Queen Hypothesis predicts that partial privatization has two major evolutionary implications. First, to favor strains producing several types of mixed goods over nonproducing strains. Second, to favor the maintenance of cooperative traits through different strains instead of having all cooperative traits present in a single strain (metabolic specialization). Despite the importance of quorum sensing regulation of mixed goods, it is unclear how partial privatization affects quorum sensing evolution. Here, we studied the influence of partial privatization on the evolution of quorum sensing. We developed a mathematical population genetics model of an unstructured microbial population considering four strains that differ in their ability to produce an autoinducer (quorum sensing signaling molecule) and a mixed good. Our model assumes that the production of the autoinducers and the mixed goods is constitutive and/or depends on quorum sensing. Our results suggest that, unless autoinducers are costless, partial privatization cannot favor quorum sensing. This result occurs because with costly autoinducers: (1) a strain that produces both autoinducer and goods (fully producing strain) cannot persist in the population; (2) the strain only producing the autoinducer and the strain producing mixed goods in response to the autoinducers cannot coexist, i.e., metabolic specialization cannot be favored. Together, partial privatization might have been crucial to favor a primordial form of quorum sensing—where autoinducers were thought to be a metabolic byproduct (costless)—but not the transition to nowadays costly autoinducers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Santana Souza & Yasuhiko Irie & Shigetoshi Eda, 2022. "Black Queen Hypothesis, partial privatization, and quorum sensing evolution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278449
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278449
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278449&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0278449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenyu Jin & Jiahong Li & Lei Ni & Rongrong Zhang & Aiguo Xia & Fan Jin, 2018. "Conditional privatization of a public siderophore enables Pseudomonas aeruginosa to resist cheater invasion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard J. Lindsay & Philippa J. Holder & Mark Hewlett & Ivana Gudelj, 2024. "Experimental evolution of yeast shows that public-goods upregulation can evolve despite challenges from exploitative non-producers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Helena R. Ma & Helen Z. Xu & Kyeri Kim & Deverick J. Anderson & Lingchong You, 2024. "Private benefit of β-lactamase dictates selection dynamics of combination antibiotic treatment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.