IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0278404.html

Uptake and determinants of private health insurance enrollment in a country with heavily subsidised public healthcare: A cross-sectional survey in East Coast Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Adli Abd Khalim
  • Surianti Sukeri

Abstract

Malaysia’s subsidised public healthcare system is heavily reliant on government funding. Increasing the uptake of private health insurance (PHI) would alleviate the financial burden on public healthcare facilities caused by high patient loads. The study aimed to determine the uptake of PHI and its associated factors among the East Coast Malaysian populations. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between February and June 2021. Proportionate stratified sampling was applied to select 1138 participants, and logistic regression was performed to determine the factors associated with PHI uptake. The proportion of the study samples that purchased PHI was 54.3%. Enrolment of private health insurance was associated with working in the public sector (aOR: 6.06, 95% CI: 2.65, 13.88) and private sector (aOR: 6.27, 95% CI: 2.65, 14.85), being self-employed (aOR: 9.23, 95% CI: (3.59, 23.70), being in the middle 40% household income percentile (aOR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.95, 3.85) and top 20% household income percentile (aOR: 4.42, 95% CI: 2.87, 6.80), and living in urban areas (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.70). Even in the presence of subsidised public healthcare, the high proportion of PHI uptake reflects a demand for private health insurance. The study suggests that PHI should be promoted among those who are employed or self-employed, the middle- and high-income groups, and urban residents. The findings may be beneficial for the government and insurance companies to improve strategies to enhance PHI uptake among these population.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Adli Abd Khalim & Surianti Sukeri, 2023. "Uptake and determinants of private health insurance enrollment in a country with heavily subsidised public healthcare: A cross-sectional survey in East Coast Malaysia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278404
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278404&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0278404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiil, Astrid, 2012. "What characterises the privately insured in universal health care systems? A review of the empirical evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 60-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marenzi, Anna & Rizzi, Dino & Zanette, Michele, 2021. "Incentives for voluntary health insurance in a national health system: Evidence from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 685-692.
    2. Aida Isabel Tavares, 2020. "Voluntary private health insurance demand determinants and risk preferences: Evidence from SHARE," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 685-703, May.
    3. Del Vecchio, Mario & Fenech, Lorenzo & Prenestini, Anna, 2015. "Private health care expenditure and quality in Beveridge systems: Cross-regional differences in the Italian NHS," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 356-366.
    4. Meleddu, Marta & Pulina, Manuela & Scuderi, Raffaele, 2020. "Public and private healthcare services: What drives the choice?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Denise Doiron & Nathan Kettlewell, 2020. "Family formation and the demand for health insurance," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 523-533, April.
    6. Linn Kullberg & Paula Blomqvist & Ulrika Winblad, 2025. "How Private Health Insurance Shapes Perceptions of Public Healthcare in Sweden," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 1048-1057, September.
    7. Kettlewell, Nathan, 2020. "Subjective Expectations for Health Service Use and Consequences for Health Insurance Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 13445, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Buchmueller, Thomas C. & Cheng, Terence C. & Pham, Ngoc T.A. & Staub, Kevin E., 2021. "The effect of income-based mandates on the demand for private hospital insurance and its dynamics," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Aline de Souza & Mônica Viegas Andrade & Kenya Valéria Micaela de Souza Noronha & Igor Viveiros Melo Souza, 2025. "Effect of age‐related premium readjustment on health insurance cancellation in Brazil: Regression discontinuity approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 3-17, January.
    10. de Mello-Sampayo; F.;, 2026. "Buying the Exit Option: Private Insurance in a Universal Health System -Evidence from Portugal, 2005-2019," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 26/08, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    11. Conor Keegan & Conor Teljeur & Brian Turner & Steve Thomas, 2017. "Addressing Market Segmentation and Incentives for Risk Selection: How Well Does Risk Equalisation in the Irish Private Health Insurance Market Work?," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 48(1), pages 61-84.
    12. Alaitz Artabe & Waleska Sigüenza, 2019. "The effects of the economic recession on spending on private health insurance in Spain," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 155-191, June.
    13. Kullberg, Linn & Blomqvist, Paula & Winblad, Ulrika, 2019. "Health insurance for the healthy? Voluntary health insurance in Sweden," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(8), pages 737-746.
    14. Stéphanie Baggio & Marc Dupuis & Hans Wolff & Patrick Bodenmann, 2018. "Associations of lack of voluntary private insurance and out-of-pocket expenditures with health inequalities. Evidence from an international longitudinal survey in countries with universal health coverage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Marijana Curak & Dujam Kovac & Klime Poposki, 2021. "The Drivers Of Voluntary Private Health Insurance Demand In European Countries," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 30(2), pages 457-474, december.
    16. Jan Michael Bauer & Jörg Schiller & Christopher Schreckenberger, 2020. "Heterogeneous selection in the market for private supplemental dental insurance: evidence from Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 205-231, July.
    17. Davide Pianori & Elisa Maietti & Jacopo Lenzi & Mattia Quargnolo & Stefano Guicciardi & Kadjo Yves Cedric Adja & Maria Pia Fantini & Federico Toth, 2020. "Sociodemographic and health service organizational factors associated with the choice of the private versus public sector for specialty visits: Evidence from a national survey in Italy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    18. Lavaste, Konsta, 2023. "Private health insurance in the universal public healthcare system: The role of healthcare provision in Finland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Jeon, Boyoung & Kwon, Soonman, 2013. "Effect of private health insurance on health care utilization in a universal public insurance system: A case of South Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 69-76.
    20. Karlsson, Martin & Klohn, Florian & Rickayzen, Ben, 2018. "The role of heterogeneous parameters for the detection of selection in insurance contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 110-121.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.