IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0278250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lost time: Perception of events timeline affected by the COVID pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Daria A Pawlak
  • Arash Sahraie

Abstract

The need to remember when a past event occurred, is often an everyday necessity. However, placing events in a timeline is seldom accurate and although to some extent modulated by event saliency, on average we are less accurate in remembering a timeline for events happening in the distant past compared to more recent events. 277 participants took part in an online study during May 2022 in which they were asked to state the year in which a number of events took place. The events’ occurrences ranged from 2017 to 2021, with participants choosing one date from the 2016–2022 range. In addition, they completed 4 questionnaires aimed at quantifying their State Boredom; Depression, Anxiety & stress; resilience; and level of activity during the lockdown periods of the COVID pandemic. As expected, the findings showed more errors for distant events than those in 2020, but surprisingly we found a large error for estimating the timing of events that occurred in 2021 matching in the extent to those 3 to 4 years earlier. The findings show that participants were less able to recall the timeline of very recent events coinciding with COVID lockdowns. This increased error in perception of event timeline correlated positively with reported levels of depression & anxiety as well as physical and mental demands during the pandemic, but negatively correlated with measures of resilience. Although measures of boredom showed significant correlations with reported depression & anxiety and physical/mental load, they did not correlate with errors in the perception of the event timeline for 2021. The findings are consistent with poor perception of event timeline reported previously in prison inmates. It is likely that an accurate perception of an event timeline relies on a collection of life events such as birthdays, holidays, travels, etc., anchoring our experiences in the time domain, which was largely absent during COVID restrictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Daria A Pawlak & Arash Sahraie, 2023. "Lost time: Perception of events timeline affected by the COVID pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0278250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Ogden, 2021. "Distortions to the passage of time during England’s second national lockdown: A role for depression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Maximilien Chaumon & Pier-Alexandre Rioux & Sophie K. Herbst & Ignacio Spiousas & Sebastian L. Kübel & Elisa M. Gallego Hiroyasu & Şerife Leman Runyun & Luigi Micillo & Vassilis Thanopoulos & Esteban , 2022. "The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1587-1599, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilien Chaumon & Pier-Alexandre Rioux & Sophie K. Herbst & Ignacio Spiousas & Sebastian L. Kübel & Elisa M. Gallego Hiroyasu & Şerife Leman Runyun & Luigi Micillo & Vassilis Thanopoulos & Esteban , 2022. "The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1587-1599, November.
    2. Ines Lee & Eileen Tipoe, 2021. "Changes in the quantity and quality of time use during the COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK: Who is the most affected?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Saad S J Alatrany & Ruth Ogden & Ashraf Muwafa Falaiyah & ‏Hasan Ali Sayyid ALdrraji & Abbas S S Alatrany, 2022. "The passage of time in Iraq during the covid-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Eiji Yamamura & Youki Kosaka & Yoshiro Tsutsui & Fumio Ohtake, 2022. "Gender differences of the effect of vaccination on perceptions of COVID-19 and mental health in Japan," Papers 2203.07663, arXiv.org.
    5. Xia Liu & Yanhan Sun & Shengshi Zhou & Yu Li & Shan Zhuang, 2024. "Research on time-value-oriented business model innovation path in life services enterprises and its impact on customer perceived value," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.