IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0277483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving risk prediction for target subpopulations: Predicting suicidal behaviors among multiple sclerosis patients

Author

Listed:
  • Yuval Barak-Corren
  • Victor M Castro
  • Solomon Javitt
  • Matthew K Nock
  • Jordan W Smoller
  • Ben Y Reis

Abstract

Several recent studies have applied machine learning techniques to develop risk algorithms that predict subsequent suicidal behavior based on electronic health record data. In this study we used a retrospective cohort study design to test whether developing more tailored predictive models—within specific subpopulations of patients—would improve predictive accuracy. A retrospective cohort of 15,117 patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS), a diagnosis associated with increased risk of suicidal behavior, was used. The cohort was randomly divided into equal sized training and validation sets. Overall, suicidal behavior was identified among 191 (1.3%) of the patients with MS. A Naïve Bayes Classifier model was trained on the training set to predict future suicidal behavior. With 90% specificity, the model detected 37% of subjects who later demonstrated suicidal behavior, on average 4.6 years before the first suicide attempt. The performance of a model trained only on MS patients was better at predicting suicide in MS patients than that a model trained on a general patient sample of a similar size (AUC of 0.77 vs. 0.66). Unique risk factors for suicidal behavior among patients with MS included pain-related codes, gastroenteritis and colitis, and history of smoking. Future studies are needed to further test the value of developing population-specific risk models.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuval Barak-Corren & Victor M Castro & Solomon Javitt & Matthew K Nock & Jordan W Smoller & Ben Y Reis, 2023. "Improving risk prediction for target subpopulations: Predicting suicidal behaviors among multiple sclerosis patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0277483
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0277483
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0277483&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0277483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0277483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.