IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0277148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a stereological method for estimating particle size and density from 2D projections with high accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Seth Rothman
  • Carolina Borges-Merjane
  • Noemi Holderith
  • Peter Jonas
  • R Angus Silver

Abstract

Stereological methods for estimating the 3D particle size and density from 2D projections are essential to many research fields. These methods are, however, prone to errors arising from undetected particle profiles due to sectioning and limited resolution, known as ‘lost caps’. A potential solution developed by Keiding, Jensen, and Ranek in 1972, which we refer to as the Keiding model, accounts for lost caps by quantifying the smallest detectable profile in terms of its limiting ‘cap angle’ (ϕ), a size-independent measure of a particle’s distance from the section surface. However, this simple solution has not been widely adopted nor tested. Rather, model-independent design-based stereological methods, which do not explicitly account for lost caps, have come to the fore. Here, we provide the first experimental validation of the Keiding model by comparing the size and density of particles estimated from 2D projections with direct measurement from 3D EM reconstructions of the same tissue. We applied the Keiding model to estimate the size and density of somata, nuclei and vesicles in the cerebellum of mice and rats, where high packing density can be problematic for design-based methods. Our analysis reveals a Gaussian distribution for ϕ rather than a single value. Nevertheless, curve fits of the Keiding model to the 2D diameter distribution accurately estimate the mean ϕ and 3D diameter distribution. While systematic testing using simulations revealed an upper limit to determining ϕ, our analysis shows that estimated ϕ can be used to determine the 3D particle density from the 2D density under a wide range of conditions, and this method is potentially more accurate than minimum-size-based lost-cap corrections and disector methods. Our results show the Keiding model provides an efficient means of accurately estimating the size and density of particles from 2D projections even under conditions of a high density.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Seth Rothman & Carolina Borges-Merjane & Noemi Holderith & Peter Jonas & R Angus Silver, 2023. "Validation of a stereological method for estimating particle size and density from 2D projections with high accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-50, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0277148
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0277148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0277148&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0277148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tri M. Nguyen & Logan A. Thomas & Jeff L. Rhoades & Ilaria Ricchi & Xintong Cindy Yuan & Arlo Sheridan & David G. C. Hildebrand & Jan Funke & Wade G. Regehr & Wei-Chung Allen Lee, 2023. "Publisher Correction: Structured cerebellar connectivity supports resilient pattern separation," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7946), pages 18-18, February.
    2. Tri M. Nguyen & Logan A. Thomas & Jeff L. Rhoades & Ilaria Ricchi & Xintong Cindy Yuan & Arlo Sheridan & David G. C. Hildebrand & Jan Funke & Wade G. Regehr & Wei-Chung Allen Lee, 2023. "Structured cerebellar connectivity supports resilient pattern separation," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7944), pages 543-549, January.
    3. C. Shan Xu & Song Pang & Gleb Shtengel & Andreas Müller & Alex T. Ritter & Huxley K. Hoffman & Shin-ya Takemura & Zhiyuan Lu & H. Amalia Pasolli & Nirmala Iyer & Jeeyun Chung & Davis Bennett & Aubrey , 2021. "An open-access volume electron microscopy atlas of whole cells and tissues," Nature, Nature, vol. 599(7883), pages 147-151, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ting-Feng Lin & Silas E. Busch & Christian Hansel, 2024. "Intrinsic and synaptic determinants of receptive field plasticity in Purkinje cells of the mouse cerebellum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Andreas Müller & Nikolai Klena & Song Pang & Leticia Elizabeth Galicia Garcia & Oleksandra Topcheva & Solange Aurrecoechea Duran & Davud Sulaymankhil & Monika Seliskar & Hassan Mziaut & Eyke Schöniger, 2024. "Structure, interaction and nervous connectivity of beta cell primary cilia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Chixiang Lu & Kai Chen & Heng Qiu & Xiaojun Chen & Gu Chen & Xiaojuan Qi & Haibo Jiang, 2024. "Diffusion-based deep learning method for augmenting ultrastructural imaging and volume electron microscopy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Güneş Parlakgül & Song Pang & Leonardo L. Artico & Nina Min & Erika Cagampan & Reyna Villa & Renata L. S. Goncalves & Grace Yankun Lee & C. Shan Xu & Gökhan S. Hotamışlıgil & Ana Paula Arruda, 2024. "Spatial mapping of hepatic ER and mitochondria architecture reveals zonated remodeling in fasting and obesity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Xia Li & Feng Qiao & Jiansheng Guo & Ting Jiang & Huifang Lou & Huixia Li & Gangcai Xie & Hangjun Wu & Weizhen Wang & Ruoyu Pei & Sha Liu & Mei Ye & Jin Li & Shiqin Huang & Mengya Zhang & Chaoye Ma & , 2025. "In situ architecture of the intercellular organelle reservoir between epididymal epithelial cells by volume electron microscopy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0277148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.