IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0276918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An instrument for measuring job satisfaction (VIJS): A validation study for community pharmacists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Thuy Thi Phuong Nguyen
  • Giang Thi Huong Truong
  • Huong Thi Thanh Nguyen
  • Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen
  • Dai Xuan Dinh
  • Binh Thanh Nguyen

Abstract

Background: Job satisfaction is one of the main factors creating and bringing about work motivation, productivity, and efficiency as well as decreasing job-hopping and job turnover. No previous studies have been conducted to assess job satisfaction for community pharmacists in Vietnam. Objective: This research was conducted to develop and validate an instrument used to measure community pharmacists’ job satisfaction in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam. Methods and results: A total of 351 pharmacists participated in this survey. Data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.0. The final instrument (VIJS) has 34 items divided into six factors which were determined via a parallel analysis (including physical working conditions, work nature, income and other benefits, management policies and managers, relationships with coworkers and customers, and learning and advancement opportunities). VIJS’s internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97, Omega total = 0.98, split-half reliability = 0.985, and composite reliability>0.8). Two-week test-retest reliability results (intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall instrument: 0.97, for six factors: 0.865–0.938) demonstrated the consistency of the VIJS when the same test was repeated on the same sample (62 pharmacists) at different points in time. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis was employed to assess the construct validity. The VIJS was a good fit to a six-factor model (Chisq/df = 2.352, Comparative Fit Index = 0.937, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.929, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.042, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.062). VIJS’s good convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated via Average Variance Extrated>0.5 and the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations

Suggested Citation

  • Thuy Thi Phuong Nguyen & Giang Thi Huong Truong & Huong Thi Thanh Nguyen & Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen & Dai Xuan Dinh & Binh Thanh Nguyen, 2022. "An instrument for measuring job satisfaction (VIJS): A validation study for community pharmacists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276918
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276918
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276918&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0276918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hai-Yen Nguyen-Thi & Thuy-Tram Nguyen-Ngoc & Minh-Thu Do-Tran & Dung Van Do & Luyen Dinh Pham & Nguyen Dang Tu Le, 2021. "Job satisfaction of clinical pharmacists and clinical pharmacy activities implemented at Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van De Tran & Thi My Loan Vo & Khanh Nguyen Di & Quang Loc Duyen Vo & Rebecca Susan Dewey & Trung Tin Pham & Ba Kien Tran & Duy Toan Pham, 2023. "Job satisfaction of hospital pharmacists in a representative province in Mekong Delta, Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.