IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0276607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting prediction: A systematic workflow to analyze factors affecting the classification performance in genomic biomarker discovery

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Netzer
  • Christian Baumgartner
  • Daniel Baumgarten

Abstract

High throughput technologies in genomics enable the analysis of small alterations in gene expression levels. Patterns of such deviations are an important starting point for the discovery and verification of new biomarker candidates. Identifying such patterns is a challenging task that requires sophisticated machine learning approaches. Currently, there are a variety of classification models, and a common approach is to compare the performance and select the best one for a given classification problem. Since the association between the features of a data set and the performance of a particular classification method is still not fully understood, the main contribution of this work is to provide a new methodology for predicting the prediction results of different classifiers in the field of biomarker discovery. We propose here a three-steps computational workflow that includes an analysis of the data set characteristics, the calculation of the classification accuracy and, finally, the prediction of the resulting classification error. The experiments were carried out on synthetic and microarray datasets. Using this method, we showed that the predictability strongly depends on the discriminatory ability of the features, e.g., sets of genes, in two or multi-class datasets. If a dataset has a certain discriminatory ability, this method enables prediction of the classification performance before applying a learning model. Thus, our results contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between dataset characteristics and the corresponding performance of a machine learning method, and suggest the optimal classification method for a given dataset based on its discriminatory ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Netzer & Christian Baumgartner & Daniel Baumgarten, 2022. "Predicting prediction: A systematic workflow to analyze factors affecting the classification performance in genomic biomarker discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276607
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276607
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276607&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0276607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seong Jae Kim & Kyong Jin Cho & Sejong Oh, 2017. "Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Onder Aydemir, 2021. "A New Performance Evaluation Metric for Classifiers: Polygon Area Metric," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(1), pages 16-26, April.
    2. Michelle Viscaino & Juan C Maass & Paul H Delano & Mariela Torrente & Carlos Stott & Fernando Auat Cheein, 2020. "Computer-aided diagnosis of external and middle ear conditions: A machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.