IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0276529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Pan
  • Shu Huang
  • Peiling Gan
  • Lei Shi
  • Huifang Xia
  • Xinyi Zeng
  • Han Zhang
  • Muhan Lü
  • Xian Zhou
  • Xiaowei Tang

Abstract

Background and aims: At present, it is difficult and risky to diagnose splenic lesions by conventional needle biopsy using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is increasingly being used as a new technique to determine the tissue diagnosis of splenic lesions. Therefore, our goal was to determine the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of splenic lesions using Metadisc. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Questionnaire, a quality assessment tool, was used to scrutinize the quality of the studies. Results: Six eligible studies between January 2000 and June 2022 were identified, and a total number of 62 patients (aged range from 19 to 84) were enrolled. One patient was excluded because of insufficient specimens. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of included studies were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.93] and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.46–0.95), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.38 (95% CI, 1.24–4.57), the pooled negative LR was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17–0.55), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 8.67 (95% CI, 2.80–26.82), the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8100 (Standard Error 0.0813). Conclusion: EUS-guided tissue acquisition is a safe technique with high sensitivity in the diagnosis of splenic lesions. However, because of the small sample sizes, more studies with more cases are needed to further validate these results.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Pan & Shu Huang & Peiling Gan & Lei Shi & Huifang Xia & Xinyi Zeng & Han Zhang & Muhan Lü & Xian Zhou & Xiaowei Tang, 2022. "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276529
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276529
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276529&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0276529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.