IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0274552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and enablers to deprescribing in long-term care: A qualitative investigation into the opinions of healthcare professionals in Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Clara H Heinrich
  • Sheena McHugh
  • Suzanne McCarthy
  • Maria D Donovan

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of polypharmacy increases with age, increasing the exposure of older adults to potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Deprescribing has been shown to reduce PIMs for older residents in long-term care; however, deprescribing is not universally implemented. This study aims to identify the barriers and enablers to deprescribing in Irish long-term care facilities from the healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) perspective. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was conducted using semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in long-term care (general practitioners, pharmacists and nurses). Purposive sampling with maximum variation was applied to select long-term care sites to identify HCPs, supplemented with convenience sampling of post-graduate HCPs from University College Cork. Data was thematically analysed and mapped to a framework of deprescribing barriers and enablers informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results: Twenty-six HCPs participated from 13 long-term care facilities. The main barriers and enablers identified mapped to five domains. Barriers included insufficient resources, lack of co-ordination between healthcare settings and negative social influences. Additional barriers exist in private settings including deprescribing awareness, commitment and the need for incentives. Deprescribing enablers included interprofessional support and patient social influence. To encourage deprescribing, potential enablers include HCP education, pharmacist role expansion and tailored deprescribing guidelines within a structured process. Conclusion: Interventions to support deprescribing should build on existing systems, involve stakeholders and utilise guidelines within a structured process. Any intervention must account for the nuanced barriers and enablers which exist in both public and private settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara H Heinrich & Sheena McHugh & Suzanne McCarthy & Maria D Donovan, 2022. "Barriers and enablers to deprescribing in long-term care: A qualitative investigation into the opinions of healthcare professionals in Ireland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274552
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274552
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274552&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0274552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cathal A. Cadogan & Cristín Ryan & Carmel M. Hughes, 2016. "Appropriate Polypharmacy and Medicine Safety: When Many is not Too Many," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 109-116, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirk Heider & Herbert Matschinger & Andreas D Meid & Renate Quinzler & Jürgen-Bernhard Adler & Christian Günster & Walter E Haefeli & Hans-Helmut König, 2018. "The impact of potentially inappropriate medication on the development of health care costs and its moderation by the number of prescribed substances. Results of a retrospective matched cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Marina Lleal & Marisa Baré & Sara Ortonobes & Daniel Sevilla-Sánchez & Rosa Jordana & Susana Herranz & Maria Queralt Gorgas & Mariona Espaulella-Ferrer & Marta Arellano & Marta de Antonio & Gloria Jul, 2022. "Comprehensive Multimorbidity Patterns in Older Patients Are Associated with Quality Indicators of Medication—MoPIM Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Eun-Hae Lee & Ju-Ok Park & Joon-Pil Cho & Choung-Ah Lee, 2021. "Prioritising Risk Factors for Prescription Drug Overdose among Older Adults in South Korea: A Multi-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Catarina Caçador & Edite Teixeira-Lemos & Jorge Oliveira & João Pinheiro & Luís Teixeira-Lemos & Fernando Ramos, 2022. "The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Its Relationship with Cognitive Status in Portuguese Institutionalized Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Derek Stewart & Kathrine Gibson-Smith & Katie MacLure & Alpana Mair & Albert Alonso & Carles Codina & Antonio Cittadini & Fernando Fernandez-Llimos & Glenda Fleming & Dimitra Gennimata & Ulrika Gilles, 2017. "A modified Delphi study to determine the level of consensus across the European Union on the structures, processes and desired outcomes of the management of polypharmacy in older people," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.