IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0274171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine-learning-derived predictive score for early estimation of COVID-19 mortality risk in hospitalized patients

Author

Listed:
  • Alba González-Cebrián
  • Joan Borràs-Ferrís
  • Juan Pablo Ordovás-Baines
  • Marta Hermenegildo-Caudevilla
  • Mónica Climente-Marti
  • Sonia Tarazona
  • Raffaele Vitale
  • Daniel Palací-López
  • Jesús Francisco Sierra-Sánchez
  • Javier Saez de la Fuente
  • Alberto Ferrer

Abstract

The clinical course of COVID-19 is highly variable. It is therefore essential to predict as early and accurately as possible the severity level of the disease in a COVID-19 patient who is admitted to the hospital. This means identifying the contributing factors of mortality and developing an easy-to-use score that could enable a fast assessment of the mortality risk using only information recorded at the hospitalization. A large database of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (n = 15,628; with 2,846 deceased) admitted to Spanish hospitals between December 2019 and July 2020 was analyzed. By means of multiple machine learning algorithms, we developed models that could accurately predict their mortality. We used the information about classifiers’ performance metrics and about importance and coherence among the predictors to define a mortality score that can be easily calculated using a minimal number of mortality predictors and yielded accurate estimates of the patient severity status. The optimal predictive model encompassed five predictors (age, oxygen saturation, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatinine) and yielded a satisfactory classification of survived and deceased patients (area under the curve: 0.8454 with validation set). These five predictors were additionally used to define a mortality score for COVID-19 patients at their hospitalization. This score is not only easy to calculate but also to interpret since it ranges from zero to eight, along with a linear increase in the mortality risk from 0% to 80%. A simple risk score based on five commonly available clinical variables of adult COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital is able to accurately discriminate their mortality probability, and its interpretation is straightforward and useful.

Suggested Citation

  • Alba González-Cebrián & Joan Borràs-Ferrís & Juan Pablo Ordovás-Baines & Marta Hermenegildo-Caudevilla & Mónica Climente-Marti & Sonia Tarazona & Raffaele Vitale & Daniel Palací-López & Jesús Francisc, 2022. "Machine-learning-derived predictive score for early estimation of COVID-19 mortality risk in hospitalized patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274171
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274171
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274171&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0274171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miren Hayet-Otero & Fernando García-García & Dae-Jin Lee & Joaquín Martínez-Minaya & Pedro Pablo España Yandiola & Isabel Urrutia Landa & Mónica Nieves Ermecheo & José María Quintana & Rosario Menénde, 2023. "Extracting relevant predictive variables for COVID-19 severity prognosis: An exhaustive comparison of feature selection techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-30, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.