IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0273693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jinhui Ni
  • Pei Wu
  • Xinlin Huang
  • Fangfang Zhang
  • Ze You
  • Qiaoling Chang
  • Li Liao

Abstract

Introduction: Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students’ knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients’ satisfaction. Methods: We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed. Ethics and dissemination: No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Protocol registration number: INPLASY2021120040.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinhui Ni & Pei Wu & Xinlin Huang & Fangfang Zhang & Ze You & Qiaoling Chang & Li Liao, 2022. "Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-6, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273693
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273693
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273693&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0273693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alhassan Basour Adam & Andrew Adjei Druye & Akwasi Kumi-Kyereme & Wahab Osman & Afizu Alhassan, 2021. "Nursing and Midwifery Students’ Satisfaction with Their Clinical Rotation Experience: The Role of the Clinical Learning Environment," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.