IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0273363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of a prediction algorithm to identify birth in countries with high tuberculosis incidence in two large California health systems

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Fischer
  • Lei Qian
  • Jacek Skarbinski
  • Katia J Bruxvoort
  • Rong Wei
  • Kris Li
  • Laura B Amsden
  • Mariah S Wood
  • Abigail Eaton
  • Brigitte C Spence
  • Sally F Shaw
  • Sara Y Tartof

Abstract

Objective: Though targeted testing for latent tuberculosis infection (“LTBI”) for persons born in countries with high tuberculosis incidence (“HTBIC”) is recommended in health care settings, this information is not routinely recorded in the electronic health record (“EHR”). We develop and validate a prediction model for birth in a HTBIC using EHR data. Materials and methods: In a cohort of patients within Kaiser Permanente Southern California (“KPSC”) and Kaiser Permanent Northern California (“KPNC”) between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2019, KPSC was used as the development dataset and KPNC was used for external validation using logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operator curve (“AUCROC”) and area under the precision and recall curve (“AUPRC”). We explored various cut-points to improve screening for LTBI. Results: KPSC had 73% and KPNC had 54% of patients missing country-of-birth information in the EHR, leaving 2,036,400 and 2,880,570 patients with EHR-documented country-of-birth at KPSC and KPNC, respectively. The final model had an AUCROC of 0.85 and 0.87 on internal and external validation datasets, respectively. It had an AUPRC of 0.69 and 0.64 (compared to a baseline HTBIC-birth prevalence of 0.24 at KPSC and 0.19 at KPNC) on internal and external validation datasets, respectively. The cut-points explored resulted in a number needed to screen from 7.1–8.5 persons/positive LTBI diagnosis, compared to 4.2 and 16.8 persons/positive LTBI diagnosis from EHR-documented birth in a HTBIC and current screening criteria, respectively. Discussion: Using logistic regression with EHR data, we developed a simple yet useful model to predict birth in a HTBIC which decreased the number needed to screen compared to current LTBI screening criteria. Conclusion: Our model improves the ability to screen for LTBI in health care settings based on birth in a HTBIC.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Fischer & Lei Qian & Jacek Skarbinski & Katia J Bruxvoort & Rong Wei & Kris Li & Laura B Amsden & Mariah S Wood & Abigail Eaton & Brigitte C Spence & Sally F Shaw & Sara Y Tartof, 2022. "Development and validation of a prediction algorithm to identify birth in countries with high tuberculosis incidence in two large California health systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273363
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273363
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273363&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0273363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.