IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0273212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COMPASS II—Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol for a feasibility study of cooperation between general practitioner practices and community care points

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Peter
  • Judith Stumm
  • Cornelia Wäscher
  • Lisa Kümpel
  • Christoph Heintze
  • Susanne Döpfmer

Abstract

Introduction: General practitioners (GP) increasingly face the challenge of meeting the complex care needs of multi-morbid patients. Previous studies show that GP practices would like support from other institutions in advising on social aspects of care for multi-morbid patients. Already existing counselling services, like community care points, are not sufficiently known by both GPs and patients. The aim of COMPASS II is to investigate the feasibility of cooperation between GP practices and community care points. Methods and analysis: During the intervention, GPs send eligible multi-morbid patients with social care needs to a community care point. The community care points report the consultation results back to the GPs. In preparation for the intervention, in a moderated process, GP practices meet with the community care points to agree on information exchange. The primary outcome is the feasibility of the cooperation: Questionnaires will be sent to GPs, medical practice assistances and community care point personnel (focus: practicality, acceptability). Data will be collected on frequency and reasons for GP-initiated consultations at community care points (focus: demand). Qualitative interviews will be conducted with all participating groups (focus: acceptability, satisfaction). The secondary outcome is the assessment of changes in health-related quality of life, social support and satisfaction with care: participating patients complete a questionnaire before and three to six months after their counselling. The results of the study will be incorporated into a manual in which the experiences of the cooperation will be made available to other GP practices and community care points. Discussion: In COMPASS II, GP practices establish cooperation with community care points. The latter are already existing institutions that provide independent and free advice on social matters. By using an existing institution, the established cooperation and experiences from the study can be used beyond the end of the study. Trial registration: The trial is registered with DRKS-ID: DRKS00023798, Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support II.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Peter & Judith Stumm & Cornelia Wäscher & Lisa Kümpel & Christoph Heintze & Susanne Döpfmer, 2022. "COMPASS II—Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol for a feasibility study of cooperation between general practitioner practices and community care points," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273212
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273212&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0273212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manfred E Beutel & Elmar Brähler & Jörg Wiltink & Matthias Michal & Eva M Klein & Claus Jünger & Philipp S Wild & Thomas Münzel & Maria Blettner & Karl Lackner & Stefan Nickels & Ana N Tibubos, 2017. "Emotional and tangible social support in a German population-based sample: Development and validation of the Brief Social Support Scale (BS6)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olenka Dworakowski & Zilla M. Huber & Tabea Meier & Ryan L. Boyd & Mike Martin & Andrea B. Horn, 2022. "You Do Not Have to Get through This Alone: Interpersonal Emotion Regulation and Psychosocial Resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic across Four Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Sze Yan Liu & Jiehui Li & Lydia F. Leon & Ralf Schwarzer & James E. Cone, 2022. "The Bidirectional Relationship between Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Social Support in a 9/11-Exposed Cohort: A Longitudinal Cross-Lagged Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Melanie Brinkmann & Maike Stolz & Annika Herr & Christoph Herrmann-Lingen & Imke Koch & Christiane Müller & Frank Müller & Uta Sekanina & Jona Theodor Stahmeyer & Martina de Zwaan & Christian Krauth &, 2024. "Care for post-COVID-19 condition in Germany from the perspectives of patients, informal caregivers and general practitioners: Study protocol for a mixed methods study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.