IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0272668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of nutritional and hydration strategies during ultramarathon events between finishers and non-finishers: A systematic review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • James W Navalta
  • Victor D Y Beck
  • Taylor M Diaz
  • Vernice E Ollano

Abstract

Ultramarathon running is a sport that is growing in popularity. Competing in an ultramarathon event is physiologically taxing on the human body, and it should not be surprising that not all individuals who enroll for an event ultimately finish. While many factors can contribute to this phenomenon, it is likely that nutritional and hydration strategies play a large role between finishing and not finishing an ultramarathon. No published paper has systematically reviewed the effects of nutritional and hydration strategies during ultramarathon events between finishers and non-finishers. This paper details our intended protocol with the following steps that create the flow of the systematic review: 1) Determine the review question and Participant, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design (PICOS) criteria; 2) Create inclusion and exclusion criteria; 3) Create and follow a search strategy; 4) Document sources that are included and excluded according to the pre-determined eligibility criteria; 5) Assess final sources for risk of bias; 6) Extract pertinent data from final full-text articles and synthesize the information; and 7) Disseminate findings of the systematic review.

Suggested Citation

  • James W Navalta & Victor D Y Beck & Taylor M Diaz & Vernice E Ollano, 2022. "Effects of nutritional and hydration strategies during ultramarathon events between finishers and non-finishers: A systematic review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-8, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0272668
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0272668
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0272668&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0272668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dustin W Davis & Bryson Carrier & Brenna Barrios & Kyle Cruz & James W Navalta, 2021. "A protocol and novel tool for systematically reviewing the effects of mindful walking on mental and cardiovascular health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0272668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.