IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0270916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic impact of a machine learning-based strategy for preparation of blood products in brain tumor surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Thara Tunthanathip
  • Sakchai Sae-heng
  • Thakul Oearsakul
  • Anukoon Kaewborisutsakul
  • Chin Taweesomboonyat

Abstract

Background: Globally, blood donation has been disturbed due to the pandemic. Consequently, the optimization of preoperative blood preparation should be a point of concern. Machine learning (ML) is one of the modern approaches that have been applied by physicians to help decision-making. The main objective of this study was to identify the cost differences of the ML-based strategy compared with other strategies in preoperative blood products preparation. A secondary objective was to compare the effectiveness indexes of blood products preparation among strategies. Methods: The study utilized a retrospective cohort design conducted on brain tumor patients who had undergone surgery between January 2014 and December 2021. Overall data were divided into two cohorts. The first cohort was used for the development and deployment of the ML-based web application, while validation, comparison of the effectiveness indexes, and economic evaluation were performed using the second cohort. Therefore, the effectiveness indexes of blood preparation and cost difference were compared among the ML-based strategy, clinical trial-based strategy, and routine-based strategy. Results: Over a 2-year period, the crossmatch to transfusion (C/T) ratio, transfusion probability (Tp), and transfusion index (Ti) of the ML-based strategy were 1.10, 57.0%, and 1.62, respectively, while the routine-based strategy had a C/T ratio of 4.67%, Tp of 27.9%%, and Ti of 0.79. The overall costs of blood products preparation among the ML-based strategy, clinical trial-based strategy, and routine-based strategy were 30, 061.56$, 57,313.92$, and 136,292.94$, respectively. From the cost difference between the ML-based strategy and routine-based strategy, we observed cost savings of 92,519.97$ (67.88%) for the 2-year period. Conclusion: The ML-based strategy is one of the most effective strategies to balance the unnecessary workloads at blood banks and reduce the cost of unnecessary blood products preparation from low C/T ratio as well as high Tp and Ti. Further studies should be performed to confirm the generalizability and applicability of the ML-based strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Thara Tunthanathip & Sakchai Sae-heng & Thakul Oearsakul & Anukoon Kaewborisutsakul & Chin Taweesomboonyat, 2022. "Economic impact of a machine learning-based strategy for preparation of blood products in brain tumor surgery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270916
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270916&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0270916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.