IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0270623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of resistive index and semi-quantitative power doppler ultrasound score in predicting acute kidney injury: A meta-analysis of prospective studies

Author

Listed:
  • Qiong Wei
  • Yu Zhu
  • Weifeng Zhen
  • Xiaoning Zhang
  • Zhenhua Shi
  • Ling Zhang
  • Jiuju Zhou

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the predictive value of the renal resistive index (RRI) and power Doppler ultrasound (PDU) on subsequent acute kidney injury (AKI) risk using a meta-analytic approach. We searched eligible studies in PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library from inception until August 2021. The parameters included the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Twenty-three prospective studies involving 2,400 patients were selected. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the RRI and PDU were 0.76 and 0.79, and 0.64 and 0.90, respectively. The pooled PLR and NLR were 3.64 and 0.31, and 6.58 and 0.40 for the RRI and PDU, respectively. The DORs of the RRI and PDU for predicting AKI were 11.76, and 16.32, respectively. The AUCs of the RRI and PDU for predicting AKI were 0.83, and 0.86, respectively. There were no significant differences between the RRI and PDU for predicting AKI in terms of sensitivity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC. The specificity of the RRI was lower than that of the PDU for predicting AKI. This study found that the predictive performance of the RRI and PDU from the Doppler ultrasound for AKI was similar, which need to be further verified based on the direct comparison results.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiong Wei & Yu Zhu & Weifeng Zhen & Xiaoning Zhang & Zhenhua Shi & Ling Zhang & Jiuju Zhou, 2022. "Performance of resistive index and semi-quantitative power doppler ultrasound score in predicting acute kidney injury: A meta-analysis of prospective studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270623
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270623
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270623&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0270623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.