Author
Listed:
- Benoit Pétré
- Marine Paridans
- Nicolas Gillain
- Eddy Husson
- Anne-Françoise Donneau
- Nadia Dardenne
- Christophe Breuer
- Fabienne Michel
- Margaux Dandoy
- Fabrice Bureau
- Laurent Gillet
- Dieudonné Leclercq
- Michèle Guillaume
Abstract
Testing strategies are crucial to prevent and control the spread of covid-19 but suffer from a lack of investment in understanding the human factors that influence their implementation. The aim of this study was to understand the factors that encourage participation and the level of engagement of nursing homes staff in a routine saliva testing programme for COVID-19 In December 2020, nursing homes (n = 571) in Wallonia (Belgium) were invited to participate in a saliva testing programme for their staff. The directors were questioned by telephone at the end of a 3-week pilot phase. 445 nursing homes took part in the evaluation questionnaire, of which 36(8%) answered that they chose not to participate in the testing programme. The average participation rate of nursing staff was 49(±25)%. Perception of the justification of the efforts required for testing and perception of practicability of the procedure were significantly associated with the adoption of the system by the nursing homes directors (OR(95%CI): 5.96(1.97–18.0), p = 0.0016); OR(95%CI): 5.64(1.94–16.4), p = 0.0015 respectively). Staff support, incentives and meetings increased the level of engagement in testing (p
Suggested Citation
Benoit Pétré & Marine Paridans & Nicolas Gillain & Eddy Husson & Anne-Françoise Donneau & Nadia Dardenne & Christophe Breuer & Fabienne Michel & Margaux Dandoy & Fabrice Bureau & Laurent Gillet & Dieu, 2022.
"Factors influencing the adoption and participation rate of nursing homes staff in a saliva testing screening programme for COVID-19,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-16, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0270551
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270551
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.