Author
Listed:
- Junichi Yamada
- Koji Akeda
- Norihiko Takegami
- Tatsuhiko Fujiwara
- Akinobu Nishimura
- Akihiro Sudo
Abstract
Purpose: Lumbar radiography is a primary screening tool for lumbar spondylosis (LS). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification is widely used to evaluate LS; however, it cannot individually evaluate each radiographic feature. The purpose of this study was to 1) evaluate radiographic LS using a novel elemental grading system and 2) investigate the relationship between the grades of radiographic LS and low back pain (LBP) in a population-based cohort study. Methods: A total of 260 (75 men, 185 women; mean age, 71.5 ± 8.7 years) participants were included in this study. Participants were divided into two groups according to the presence of LBP (LBP- and LBP+ groups). Radiographic features, including osteophyte (OP), disc height narrowing (DHN), vertebral sclerosis (VS), and spondylolisthesis (SL), were classified between grades of 0–2 grades according to the extent of radiographic changes. The sum of grades at each intervertebral level was designated as the intervertebral grade (IG). Results: Intra- and inter-observer reliability (kappa coefficient) of OP, DHN, VS, and SL were 0.82–0.92. OP, DHN, VS, and IG grades were significantly higher in the LBP+ group than in the LBP- group. There were no significant differences in KL grades between the LBP- and LBP+ groups. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that VS grade was a significant independent factor associated with LBP. Conclusion: The novel elemental grading system of LS would reflect LBP more accurately than the KL classification by individually evaluating each radiographic feature.
Suggested Citation
Junichi Yamada & Koji Akeda & Norihiko Takegami & Tatsuhiko Fujiwara & Akinobu Nishimura & Akihiro Sudo, 2022.
"Novel elemental grading system for radiographic lumbar spondylosis in a population based-cohort study of a Japanese mountain village,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0270282
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270282
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.