IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0269762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic delay of sarcoidosis: Protocol for an integrated systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Tergel Namsrai
  • Christine Phillips
  • Jane Desborough
  • Dianne Gregory
  • Elaine Kelly
  • Matthew Cook
  • Anne Parkinson

Abstract

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a rare systemic inflammatory granulomatous disease of unknown cause. It can manifest in any organ. The incidence of sarcoidosis varies across countries, and by ethnicity and gender. Delays in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis can lead to extension of the disease and organ impairment. Diagnosis delay is attributed in part to the lack of a single diagnostic test or unified commonly used diagnostic criteria, and to the diversity of disease manifestations and symptom load. There is a paucity of evidence examining the determinants of diagnostic delay in sarcoidosis and the experiences of people with sarcoidosis related to delayed diagnosis. We aim to systematically review available evidence about diagnostic delay in sarcoidosis to elucidate the factors associated with diagnostic delay for this disease in different contexts and settings, and the consequences for people with sarcoidosis. Methods and analysis: A systematic search of the literature will be conducted using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and ProQuest databases, and sources of grey literature, up to 25th of May 2022, with no limitations on publication date. We will include all study types (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) except review articles, examining diagnostic delay, incorrect diagnosis, missed diagnosis or slow diagnosis of all types of sarcoidosis across all age groups. We will also examine evidence of patients’ experiences associated with diagnostic delay. Only studies in English, German and Indonesian will be included. The outcomes we examine will be diagnostic delay time, patients’ experiences, and factors associated with diagnostic delay in sarcoidosis. Two people will independently screen the titles and abstracts of search results, and then the remaining full-text documents against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved with a third reviewer until consensus is reached. Selected studies will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A meta-analysis and subgroup analyses of quantitative data will be conducted. Meta-aggregation methods will be used to analyse qualitative data. If there is insufficient data for these analyses, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Discussion: This review will provide systematic and integrated evidence on the diagnostic delay, associated factors, and experiences of diagnosis delay among people with all types of sarcoidosis. This knowledge may shed light on ways to improve diagnosis delays in diagnosis across different subpopulations, and with different disease presentations. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval will not be required as no human recruitment or participation will be involved. Findings of the study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, conferences, and symposia. Trial registration: PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42022307236. URL of the PROSPERO registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPEROFILES/307236_PROTOCOL_20220127.pdf.

Suggested Citation

  • Tergel Namsrai & Christine Phillips & Jane Desborough & Dianne Gregory & Elaine Kelly & Matthew Cook & Anne Parkinson, 2023. "Diagnostic delay of sarcoidosis: Protocol for an integrated systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269762
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269762
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269762&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0269762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.