IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0269427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of employees’ sense of power on supervisors’ voice endorsement: A cross-level moderated mediation model

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Yuan
  • Yuan Cheng
  • Yanbin Liu
  • Fanghui Ju

Abstract

Based on expectation states theory, we examined the mechanism underlying the effect of employees’ sense of power on supervisors’ voice endorsement, and tested our hypothesized model on a sample of 307 employees from 60 work teams. We used a two-time lagged design and paired questionnaire survey. Our analysis indicated that employees’ sense of power enhanced supervisors’ voice endorsement, and supervisors’ perceived voice constructiveness mediated this relationship. Multilevel analyses showed that power distance negatively moderated the influence of sense of power on perceived voice constructiveness and negatively moderated its indirect effect on voice endorsement.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Yuan & Yuan Cheng & Yanbin Liu & Fanghui Ju, 2022. "The effect of employees’ sense of power on supervisors’ voice endorsement: A cross-level moderated mediation model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269427
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269427
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269427&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0269427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.