IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0269232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of a case-finding algorithm for the identification of non-small cell lung cancers in a region-wide Italian pathology registry

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Spini
  • Pietro Rosellini
  • Cristiana Bellan
  • Folco Furiesi
  • Silvano Giorgi
  • Sandra Donnini
  • Rosa Gini
  • Marina Ziche
  • Francesco Salvo
  • Giuseppe Roberto

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a case-finding algorithm for the identification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cases in a region-wide Italian pathology registry (PR). Materials and methods: Data collected between 2009 and 2017 in the PR and the Pharmacy Database of the University Hospital of Siena and the PR of Tuscany region were used. A NSCLC-identification algorithm based on free-text keywords and SNOMED morphology and topography codes was designed and tested on data from Siena: indication for drug use (i.e. NSCLC) was the reference standard for sensitivity (SE); positive predictive value (PPV) was estimated through manual review. Algorithm modifications were then tested to improve algorithm performance: PPV was calculated against validated dataset from PR of Siena; a range of SE [min-max] was estimated in PR of Tuscany using analytical formulae that assumed NSCLC incidence equal either to 80% or 90% of overall lung cancer incidence recorded in Tuscany. The algorithm modification with the best performance was chosen as the final version of the algorithm. A random sample of 200 cases was extracted from the PR of Tuscany for manual review. Results: The first version of the algorithm showed a PPV of 74.7% and SE of 79% in PR of Siena. The final version of the algorithm had a SE in PR of Tuscany that grew with calendar time (2009 = [24.7%-28%]; 2017 = [57.9%-65.1%]) and a PPV of 93%. Conclusions: The final NSCLC-finding algorithm showed with very high PPV. SE was in line with the expected contribution of PR to overall cases captured in the regional Cancer Registry, with a trend of increase over calendar time. Given the promising algorithm validity and the wide use of SNOMED terminology in electronic pathology records, the proposed algorithm is expected to be easily adapted to other electronic databases for (pharmaco)epidemiology purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Spini & Pietro Rosellini & Cristiana Bellan & Folco Furiesi & Silvano Giorgi & Sandra Donnini & Rosa Gini & Marina Ziche & Francesco Salvo & Giuseppe Roberto, 2022. "Development and validation of a case-finding algorithm for the identification of non-small cell lung cancers in a region-wide Italian pathology registry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269232
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269232&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0269232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaatje Bollaerts & Alexandros Rekkas & Tom De Smedt & Caitlin Dodd & Nick Andrews & Rosa Gini, 2020. "Disease misclassification in electronic healthcare database studies: Deriving validity indices—A contribution from the ADVANCE project," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.